Difference between revisions of "Team:BIT-China/Promoter"

(Created page with "{{BIT-China}} <html> <head> <style> #mw-content-text{ font-family: "Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.42857143; } #...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 110: Line 110:
 
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/45/T--BIT-China--content_bg.jpg)">
 
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/45/T--BIT-China--content_bg.jpg)">
 
          
 
          
 +
   
 
     <div class="content-right" style="float: left;width:100%;padding: 10px;">
 
     <div class="content-right" style="float: left;width:100%;padding: 10px;">
  
Line 116: Line 117:
  
 
                 <div class="content-title col-sm-12">
 
                 <div class="content-title col-sm-12">
                     Lambda Red recombination
+
                     Promoter mutation
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
  
Line 125: Line 126:
 
                         <div class="block-content-item-block">
 
                         <div class="block-content-item-block">
 
                             <div>
 
                             <div>
                                 Recombineering (recombination-mediated genetic engineering) is an efficient molecular engineering technique used for gene replacement, deletion and insertion. Compared to the traditional technology like digestion and ligation, it’s based on the homologous recombination (HR) and can achieve DNA modification without the restriction enzyme and ligase.
+
                                 The regulation of gene expression is always the key point for most scientists to study. Traditionally, the functional gene is recognized to be controlled by the transcriptional promoter. And the promoter DNA interacting with RNA polymerase during the initiation of transcription has been extensively researched over recent decades.  Among the defined findings, the binding affinity and the open rate of complex formation are two key factors governing the promoter strength.
                                 <br>The homologous recombination in E.coli is mediated by proteins called recombinase. The traditional way is dependent on the RecA protein. Nevertheless, there are some limitations like the requirements for long homologous region and the low efficiency of successful recombination. In 1998, a new technique based on Red recombination system is firstly reported to dramatically improve the capacity of gene replacement on the chromosome of E.coli [1]. In recent decades, Red recombination has been extensively employed in gene editing of E.coli due to its distinguished advantages, such as the high efficiency of recombination and the requirement of short homologous arms.
+
                                 <br>There are two regions predicting to play essential roles in prokaryotic transcription initiation, which are located at -10 and -35 regions. According to the specific effects of these two conserved sequence, plenty of mutations were built to investigate. It is important to make the mutational analysis to establish library with varying strengths promoters and to make the basic biological research easier.
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
Line 138: Line 139:
  
 
                             <div>
 
                             <div>
                                 Cloning methods based on cleavage and joining reactions are used for DNA modification and amplification on plasmid vectors, but it’s limited to the gene editing on chromosome. According to the DNA double strand break and repair recombination pathway, the modified tool—“Red recombination” was created for efficient operation on chromosome [2].
+
                                 As the first step of gene expression in prokaryote, the promoter is the DNA sequence affecting the frequency and location of transcription initiation through interaction with RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Two conserved regions about the -35 region and the -10 region were regarded as carriers containing those properties.
                                 <br>To generate recombinant DNA molecules and achieve gene replacement, three steps are required. Firstly, primers containing 30-50 nt sequence identical to the target sequence are synthesized to attain the PCR product homologous with the target. Second, cells are induced for Exo, Beta and Gam function and are made competent for electroporation. Finally, recombination occurs between the amplified PCR product and the target site on chromosome after electroporation [3].
+
                                 <br>-35 Region:
 +
                                <br>During the transcriptional initiation, RNA polymerase and its associated Sigma factor will recognize this element. The RNA polymerase attaches itself to the template DNA strand and proceeds to slide the entire strand from 3’ to 5’ direction. Defined by sequence data, the overall strength of a promoter is important while various mutational analysis showed this region is involved in the initial binding affinity of holoenzyme. For a mutational analysis, kinds of strength revealed promoters have been constructed by replace each base. Higher-strength the natural promoter is, the wider range of efficient hybrid promoter will be get. Considered there is 6 bases of a group comprised in -35 region, 4096 mutations are the upper limit.
 +
                                <br>Base substitutions at position —31 gave only a little effect; base substitution sat position -32 caused significant reduction independent of which base replaced cytosine; base substitutions at position —35 also led to reduction, although the effects were somewhat smaller than those of -32 base substitutions; the effects of base substitutions at position -33, -34 and -36 were variable depending on the actual base introduced. The rate of open complex formation (parameter II) was slower for most variant promoters than for the wild-type promoter, except for the 34G (consensus) and the 33G promoters. Promoters containing altered bases at position —31 were less affected.
 +
                                <br>
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
 
                             <div>
 
                             <div>
                                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/c/c0/T--BIT-China--Science--Recombination--fig1.png"
+
                                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/45/T--BIT-China--Science--Promoter--fig1.png
                                    alt="fig1" style="height: 350px;" class="center-block">
+
                                " alt="fig1" style="width: 60%;" class="center-block">
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
                             <div style="margin-top: 1em">
+
                             <div>
                                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d8/T--BIT-China--Science--Recombination--fig2.png"
+
                                 <br>-10 Region:
                                    alt="fig2" style="width: 500px;" class="center-block">
+
                                <br>Similar to -35 region of a promoter, -10 region is another conserved region. Generally, it is involved in DNA melting efficiency—the rate of open promoter complex formation.
 +
                                <br>
 +
                                <br>The distance between the -35 and -10 regions:
 +
                                <br>For about 92% of promoters had inter-region spacing of 17bp, plus or minis 1bp. The length of it also plays a role in promoter activity and strength.
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
Line 159: Line 166:
 
                         <div class="block-content-item-block">
 
                         <div class="block-content-item-block">
 
                             <div>
 
                             <div>
                                 The phenomenon of plasmid lost is very common. To prove a new concept of plasmid quorum sensing, we need to adjust our design according to different situations. Typically, the losing of plasmid will happen both in low-copy plasmid and high-copy one. Since our gene circuits for sensing and controlling the plasmid numbers are also loaded on the target plasmid, we need to avoid the completely lost of plasmids or the system will not reach the expected effects. That is, the engineered E.coli cannot sense and control the plasmids due to the deficiency of its functional parts.
+
                                 pTet: tccctatcagtgatagaga ttgaca tccctatcagtgatagagatactgagcac
                                 <br>To solve the problem above, we aim to employ the Lambda Red Recombination system to integrate the functional parts of our project into the genome. The two main factors which will influence the recombination efficiency are the target sites and the length of homologous arms.
+
                                <br>
                                 <br>After a period of try-error, we have successfully integrate several functional circuits in the form of DNA linear fragments into the chromosome of E.coli DH5α. The efficient tool of genome editing based on recombination has expanded the application of our project and greatly facilitated the measurement of our setting thresholds when the plasmid comes to the low-copy concentration.
+
                                <br>In our basic circuit, we aim to find out the relationship between plasmid numbers and inhibitor concentration. However, when plasmids lost, inhibitor drops to a threshold, and resulted in the in-promoter is enough to express killer gene. So what if we want to kill the “slacker” by using different thresholds after well-constructing our circuits? Then we come to devote us to mutation in-promoters context.
 +
                                <br>Alteration or removal of -35 region sequences of the tet promoter can greatly affect in vivo promoter activity,by targeting the cause, we choose to mutate pTet to set promoters with varying strength. Amongst all the base pairs, the natural promoter was coincident with Darwinist survival of the fittest, it’s because of homological regions.
 +
                                 <br>Promoter mutations construction described shows the function of each base, especially those in conserved regions and played roles in gene expression. On the other hand, promoters like pTac have been widely discussed, pTac and pTet DNA sequences are bending to RNA polymerase with same sigma factor. For our goal of mutating pTet, we decide to mutate it site-directed firstly refers to the results of pTac mutations.
 +
                                <br>Secondly, we will create new regions to attempt at changing the strength, adjacent to -35 region and -10 region, or altering the spacing length.
 +
                                 <br>However, these two steps are based on our rational design, in fact, we also need to use error-prone pcr to explore if there is somewhere new could affect the gene expression.
 
                             </div>
 
                             </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
                </div>
 
 
                <div class="reference block-content" style="margin-top: 20px;font-size: 0.8em">
 
                    REFERENCE
 
                    <br>[1] Murphy K C. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. [J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1998, 180(8):2063-71.
 
                    <br>[2] Yu D, Ellis H M, Lee E C, et al. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000, 97(11):5978-5983.
 
                    <br>[3] Lynn T, Court D L, Mikail B, et al. Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination. [J]. 2014, 106: Unit 1.16-Unit 1.16.
 
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
  

Latest revision as of 02:40, 11 November 2016

backtop
Promoter mutation
Background
The regulation of gene expression is always the key point for most scientists to study. Traditionally, the functional gene is recognized to be controlled by the transcriptional promoter. And the promoter DNA interacting with RNA polymerase during the initiation of transcription has been extensively researched over recent decades. Among the defined findings, the binding affinity and the open rate of complex formation are two key factors governing the promoter strength.
There are two regions predicting to play essential roles in prokaryotic transcription initiation, which are located at -10 and -35 regions. According to the specific effects of these two conserved sequence, plenty of mutations were built to investigate. It is important to make the mutational analysis to establish library with varying strengths promoters and to make the basic biological research easier.
Mechanism
As the first step of gene expression in prokaryote, the promoter is the DNA sequence affecting the frequency and location of transcription initiation through interaction with RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Two conserved regions about the -35 region and the -10 region were regarded as carriers containing those properties.
-35 Region:
During the transcriptional initiation, RNA polymerase and its associated Sigma factor will recognize this element. The RNA polymerase attaches itself to the template DNA strand and proceeds to slide the entire strand from 3’ to 5’ direction. Defined by sequence data, the overall strength of a promoter is important while various mutational analysis showed this region is involved in the initial binding affinity of holoenzyme. For a mutational analysis, kinds of strength revealed promoters have been constructed by replace each base. Higher-strength the natural promoter is, the wider range of efficient hybrid promoter will be get. Considered there is 6 bases of a group comprised in -35 region, 4096 mutations are the upper limit.
Base substitutions at position —31 gave only a little effect; base substitution sat position -32 caused significant reduction independent of which base replaced cytosine; base substitutions at position —35 also led to reduction, although the effects were somewhat smaller than those of -32 base substitutions; the effects of base substitutions at position -33, -34 and -36 were variable depending on the actual base introduced. The rate of open complex formation (parameter II) was slower for most variant promoters than for the wild-type promoter, except for the 34G (consensus) and the 33G promoters. Promoters containing altered bases at position —31 were less affected.
fig1

-10 Region:
Similar to -35 region of a promoter, -10 region is another conserved region. Generally, it is involved in DNA melting efficiency—the rate of open promoter complex formation.

The distance between the -35 and -10 regions:
For about 92% of promoters had inter-region spacing of 17bp, plus or minis 1bp. The length of it also plays a role in promoter activity and strength.
Application in our project
pTet: tccctatcagtgatagaga ttgaca tccctatcagtgatagagatactgagcac

In our basic circuit, we aim to find out the relationship between plasmid numbers and inhibitor concentration. However, when plasmids lost, inhibitor drops to a threshold, and resulted in the in-promoter is enough to express killer gene. So what if we want to kill the “slacker” by using different thresholds after well-constructing our circuits? Then we come to devote us to mutation in-promoters context.
Alteration or removal of -35 region sequences of the tet promoter can greatly affect in vivo promoter activity,by targeting the cause, we choose to mutate pTet to set promoters with varying strength. Amongst all the base pairs, the natural promoter was coincident with Darwinist survival of the fittest, it’s because of homological regions.
Promoter mutations construction described shows the function of each base, especially those in conserved regions and played roles in gene expression. On the other hand, promoters like pTac have been widely discussed, pTac and pTet DNA sequences are bending to RNA polymerase with same sigma factor. For our goal of mutating pTet, we decide to mutate it site-directed firstly refers to the results of pTac mutations.
Secondly, we will create new regions to attempt at changing the strength, adjacent to -35 region and -10 region, or altering the spacing length.
However, these two steps are based on our rational design, in fact, we also need to use error-prone pcr to explore if there is somewhere new could affect the gene expression.