Difference between revisions of "Team:HUST-China/Results"

Line 221: Line 221:
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <p>
 
                 <p>
                    Phicia pastoris is typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes is still a big challenge. So we firstly test whether our three interest genes can be efficiently expressed. We measured the Exogenous expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2, We found there is no significant difference between the three proteins and it is worth noting that PP2CA level is less than the other two. But considering that PP2CA is a phosphorylase, the typical enzymatic reaction rate is fast enough to reduce the effect brought by the amount deficiency.
+
                  Pichia pastoris are typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes are still a big challenge. So we firstly tested whether our three interest genes can be efficient expressed. We measured the secretion expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2. We ran a SDS-PAGE of the culture supernatants of induced cells to identify the three recombinant proteins(Fig1). Compared to vector trasnfected cells, 3 kinds of recombinant protein plasmids trasnfected cells all expressed proteins at ~80kD under induction. The shift of protein bands suggested potential glycosylation modification.
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
 +
                <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b1/T--HUST-China--SDS.png" alt="" class="img-responsive">
 +
 
                  
 
                  
                <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/16/T--HUST-China--Experiments-BCA_curve.png" alt="" class="half_width">
+
         
             
+
                 <p style="text-align:center">Fig3</p>
                <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/24/T--HUST-China--Experiments-protein_measure.png" alt="" class="half_width">
+
 
                 <p style="text-align:center;width:40%;display:inline-block;margin-left:5%">Fig1</p>
+
                <p style="text-align:center;width:40%;display:inline-block;margin-left:5%">Fig2</p>
+
                <p>And then, we ran a SDS-PAGE to identify the three proteins(Fig2). The left figure shows that our target bands are shifted to the length between 72kD and 95kD. We supposed that the protein had been glycosylated
+
                </p>
+
                <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b1/T--HUST-China--SDS.png" alt="" class="half_width">
+
                <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/01/T--HUST-China--Experiments-SDS%2BE.png" alt="" class="half_width">
+
                <p style="text-align:center;width:40%;display:inline-block;margin-left:5%">Fig3</p>
+
                <p style="text-align:center;width:40%;display:inline-block;margin-left:5%">Fig4</p>
+
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <h3 >Bi-stable function:</h3>
 
                 <h3 >Bi-stable function:</h3>
 
                 <p>
 
                 <p>
                     We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036030</a>) to the registry. But on account of long-term , we didn’t have enough time to test its function. But our modeling simulated the switch functions.  
+
                     We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036030</a>) to the registry. But due to the limited time, its function characterization is still under testing. However, our modeling simulation showed promising switch functions.  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Model/model-euk"><button type="button" class="btn btn-info center-block"> see our bi-stable modeling result</button></a>
 
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Model/model-euk"><button type="button" class="btn btn-info center-block"> see our bi-stable modeling result</button></a>
Line 248: Line 242:
 
                 <h3 id="location_pro_rea">Protein&protein reaction</h3>
 
                 <h3 id="location_pro_rea">Protein&protein reaction</h3>
 
                 <p>--CIII and Ftsh</p>
 
                 <p>--CIII and Ftsh</p>
                 <p>We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036014">BBa_K2036014</a> ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036015">BBa_K2036015</a> ) These two parts were to test the whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. But we met problems transfer the segment from pSB1C3 to pET-Duet-1 expression plasmid. So we were late to put the result on wiki, but we would show it at the Jamboree. </p>
+
                 <p>We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036014">BBa_K2036014</a> ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036015">BBa_K2036015</a> ) These two parts were to test the whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. They were under transfection step at the due time of wiki freezing. We will be very glad to show this part of data at the poster and presentation section on Jamboree. </p>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <h3 id="location_pro&pro">Protein&promoter</h3>
 
                 <h3 id="location_pro&pro">Protein&promoter</h3>
Line 265: Line 259:
 
                         <p>CII (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036000</a>) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE. </p>
 
                         <p>CII (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036000</a>) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE. </p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">
                         <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from CK.And we also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.</p>
+
                         <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from CK.
 +
We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.
 +
</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4b/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4b/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
  
Line 275: Line 271:
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
                         <p>CI is a repressor from bacteriophage lambda. And to test its interaction with pR promoter, we constructed CI-TT-pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 and take pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 as control to test its inhibition function.As the Relative Fluorescent intensity measurement data shows, CI can inhibit pR to some degree but the leakage expression under pR can not be ignored, so we should consider to increase the binding sites within pR or the amount of CI coding sequence in the circuit.</p>
+
                         <p>CI is a repressor from bacteriophage lambda. To test its interaction with pR promoter, we constructed CI-TT-pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 and take pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 as control to test its inhibition function.
 +
As the Relative Fluorescent intensity measurement data shows, CI can inhibit pR in minor degree but the leakage expression under pR can’t be ignored, so we should consider to increase the binding sites within pR or the amount of CI coding sequence in the circuit.
 +
</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d1/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_plate.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d1/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_plate.png" alt="">
                         <p>We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minute, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below).</p>
+
                         <p>We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minute, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below).From figure we can find the fluorescence of both two groups was increasing over time and it is obvious that the test group which contains CI expressed less GFP protein than control group. The results verify the inhibition of CI to pR from a more intuitive way.</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/63/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/63/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
  
Line 316: Line 314:
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/T--HUST-China--Experiments-LVAssrA.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fa/T--HUST-China--Experiments-LVAssrA.png" alt="">
 
                         <p style="text-align:center">Fig: LVAssrAtag degradation rate measurement under placI</p>
 
                         <p style="text-align:center">Fig: LVAssrAtag degradation rate measurement under placI</p>
                         <p>Seen from the figure, we are sorry to find the serious placI expression leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes. </p>
+
                         <p>From the figure above, we are sorry to find the serious placI expression can not be prohibited from leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes. which also offered a interesting and useful tool for fastly down regulating certain target protein. </p>
  
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
Line 329: Line 327:
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
                         <p>Owing to limitation of time, we didn’t test lactic balance function of our engineered strain in vitro. But we tried to characterize plac-induced beta-galactosidase activity to prove that half of our bi-stable switch works.</p>
+
                         <p>Due to the limited time before wiki freezing, we didn’t completed the test of lactic balance function of our engineered strain in vitro. But we tried to characterize plac-induced beta-galactosidase activity to prove that half of our bi-stable switch works.</p>
 
                         <p>We tested enzyme activity of our strain cultured at pH6.5, 7.5 and 8.5.</p>
 
                         <p>We tested enzyme activity of our strain cultured at pH6.5, 7.5 and 8.5.</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">

Revision as of 12:43, 18 October 2016

Results

Results

Eukaryote


Protein expression

Pichia pastoris are typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes are still a big challenge. So we firstly tested whether our three interest genes can be efficient expressed. We measured the secretion expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2. We ran a SDS-PAGE of the culture supernatants of induced cells to identify the three recombinant proteins(Fig1). Compared to vector trasnfected cells, 3 kinds of recombinant protein plasmids trasnfected cells all expressed proteins at ~80kD under induction. The shift of protein bands suggested potential glycosylation modification.

Fig3


Bi-stable function:

We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part (BBa_K2036030) to the registry. But due to the limited time, its function characterization is still under testing. However, our modeling simulation showed promising switch functions.

Prokaryote


Protein&protein reaction

--CIII and Ftsh

We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014 ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015 ) These two parts were to test the whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. They were under transfection step at the due time of wiki freezing. We will be very glad to show this part of data at the poster and presentation section on Jamboree.


Protein&promoter

  • --CII and pRE

    more details
  • CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE.

    According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from CK. We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.

  • --CI and pR

    more details
  • CI is a repressor from bacteriophage lambda. To test its interaction with pR promoter, we constructed CI-TT-pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 and take pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 as control to test its inhibition function. As the Relative Fluorescent intensity measurement data shows, CI can inhibit pR in minor degree but the leakage expression under pR can’t be ignored, so we should consider to increase the binding sites within pR or the amount of CI coding sequence in the circuit.

    We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minute, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below).From figure we can find the fluorescence of both two groups was increasing over time and it is obvious that the test group which contains CI expressed less GFP protein than control group. The results verify the inhibition of CI to pR from a more intuitive way.

  • --Cro and pRM

    more details
  • We characterized Cro and pRM inhibition by the same method as CI and pR’s. From line chart and fluorescence detection, we can see that the test group contains Cro expressed less GFP protein than control group over time. It proves that Cro can effectively bind pRM to block its downstream gene’s transcription.



Tri-stable function

  • --Preliminary experiments of ptrp2

    more details
  • Ptrp2(BBa_K2036000) is an improved part from HUST-China 2015, we employed it as one of our signal sensor to test our tri-stable switch. We constructed ptrp2-GFP-pSB1C3 to determine an appropriate induction concentration.

    According to the GFP expression curve, we choce 50μM final concentration to induce ptrp2

  • --Preliminary experiments of LVAssrA-tag

    more details
  • In order to prove that our toolkit is efficient to switch two interest genes’ expression from GFP to RFP and to eliminate the accumulation of expressed protein to interfere our measurement. We fused a degradation tag at the amino terminal of our reporter. And we used placI from the Rgistery (BBa_J04500) to characterize the degradation tag LVAssrA.

    We use IPTG with final concentration of 1mM to induce the GFP-LVAssrAtag and measure the relative fluorescence through plate reader with Excitation light 495nm.

    Fig: LVAssrAtag degradation rate measurement under placI

    From the figure above, we are sorry to find the serious placI expression can not be prohibited from leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes. which also offered a interesting and useful tool for fastly down regulating certain target protein.

Application


  • Beta-galactosidase activity:

    more details
  • Due to the limited time before wiki freezing, we didn’t completed the test of lactic balance function of our engineered strain in vitro. But we tried to characterize plac-induced beta-galactosidase activity to prove that half of our bi-stable switch works.

    We tested enzyme activity of our strain cultured at pH6.5, 7.5 and 8.5.