Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Integrated Practices"

(Prototype team page)
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Uppsala}}
+
{{Uppsala/CSS}} {{Uppsala/Header}}
 +
 
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
 +
</html>
  
<div class="column full_size judges-will-not-evaluate">
+
{{Uppsala/Navbar}}
<h3>★  ALERT! </h3>
+
<html>
<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Integrated Human Practices award</a>. </p>
+
  
 +
<body>
 +
<div class="container">
  
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal. See more information at <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards/Instructions"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
+
 +
        <div class="row">
 +
 
 +
            <div style="margin:auto; float: none;" class="col-lg-8">
 +
              <h2 class="text"> Integrated Practices</h2>
 +
                <img class="img-responsive img-rounded" style="clip: rect(0px,500px,0px,0px);" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4a/T--Uppsala--Outreach.png" />
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
        <div class="row">
 +
            <div class="col-lg-8 text">
 +
  <hr>
 +
                <div class="col-lg-12">
 +
<p>
 +
Our first designs of the microfluidic chip were quite different from the final design. Although we made several different moulds for the chips the manufacturing process of the manufacturing steps after using the mould remained the same throughout the project. We found that the process worked well and therefore developed a manual with the hope of facilitating the making of microfluidic chips for other iGEM teams as well as for other low budget laboratories.
 +
</p>
  
 +
<p>
 +
In order to make our manufacturing method more comprehensible for the final users, we contacted the Stockholm based biohacker community Makerspace about our microfluidic chips. We sent them files containing our CAD designs as well as a manual on how to manufacture their own chips. The manual as well as our other guides on how to make the chips was then rewritten into a final version based on the feedback from the biohackers. As our manufacturing method makes microfluidic chips more accessible, they will mainly assist smaller labs with lower budget. Biohackers therefore felt like the obvious choice to ask for feedback. We hope that the feedback provided have made our guides easier to understand and our chips, in turn, even more accessible.
  
 
+
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Uppsala/HP/Gold">
<div class="column full_size">
+
                        <div class="mybutton text-center results panel-default">
 
+
                            <div class="panel-body"> <h4 style="color: ghostwhite;">More on the Manual can be read here</h4> </div>
<p>Do you want to be considered for the <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Judging/Awards#SpecialPrizes">Best Integrated Human Practices award</a>? Help the judges consider your team for this award by describing your work on this page.</p>
+
                        </div>
 
+
                    </a>
 
+
<p>Here are two examples of excellent Integrated Human Practices work from 2015:</p>
+
<ul>
+
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Practices">Bielefeld 2015</a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Edinburgh/Practices">Edinburgh 2015</a></li>
+
</ul>
+
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
  
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
</body>
  
 
+
</html>
 
+
{{Uppsala/Footer}}
 +
<html>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 18:46, 18 October 2016

Integrated Practices


Our first designs of the microfluidic chip were quite different from the final design. Although we made several different moulds for the chips the manufacturing process of the manufacturing steps after using the mould remained the same throughout the project. We found that the process worked well and therefore developed a manual with the hope of facilitating the making of microfluidic chips for other iGEM teams as well as for other low budget laboratories.

In order to make our manufacturing method more comprehensible for the final users, we contacted the Stockholm based biohacker community Makerspace about our microfluidic chips. We sent them files containing our CAD designs as well as a manual on how to manufacture their own chips. The manual as well as our other guides on how to make the chips was then rewritten into a final version based on the feedback from the biohackers. As our manufacturing method makes microfluidic chips more accessible, they will mainly assist smaller labs with lower budget. Biohackers therefore felt like the obvious choice to ask for feedback. We hope that the feedback provided have made our guides easier to understand and our chips, in turn, even more accessible.