Difference between revisions of "Team:HUST-China/Results"

Line 232: Line 232:
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <p>
 
                 <p>
                   Pichia pastoris are typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes are still a big challenge. So we firstly tested whether our three interest genes can be efficient expressed. We measured the secretion expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2. We ran a SDS-PAGE of the culture supernatants of induced cells to identify the three recombinant proteins(Fig1). Compared to vector trasnfected cells, 3 kinds of recombinant protein plasmids trasnfected cells all expressed proteins at ~80kD under induction. The shift of protein bands suggested potential glycosylation modification.
+
                   Pichia pastoris are typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes is still a big challenge. So we firstly tested whether our three interest genes can be efficiently expressed. We measured the secretion expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2. We ran a SDS-PAGE of the culture supernatants of induced cells to identify the three recombinant proteins(Fig1). Compared to vector transformed cells, 3 kinds of recombinant protein plasmids transformed cells all expressed proteins at ~80kD under induction. The shift of protein bands suggested potential glycosylation modification.
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
 
                 <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b1/T--HUST-China--SDS.png" alt="" class="img-responsive">
 
                 <img src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b1/T--HUST-China--SDS.png" alt="" class="img-responsive">
Line 243: Line 243:
 
                 <h3 >Bi-stable function:</h3>
 
                 <h3 >Bi-stable function:</h3>
 
                 <p>
 
                 <p>
                     We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part BBa_K2036030 to the registry. But due to the limited time, its function characterization is still under testing. However, our modeling simulation showed promising switch functions. See to Eukaryote circuit modeling (click here).  
+
                     We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036030">BBa_K2036030</a> to the registry. But due to the limited time, its function characterization is still under test. However, our modeling simulation showed promising switch functions. See to Eukaryote circuit modeling (click here).  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Model/model-euk"><button type="button" class="btn btn-info center-block"> see our bi-stable modeling result</button></a>
 
<a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Model/model-euk"><button type="button" class="btn btn-info center-block"> see our bi-stable modeling result</button></a>
Line 251: Line 251:
 
                 <h2>Prokaryote</h2>
 
                 <h2>Prokaryote</h2>
 
                 <br>
 
                 <br>
                 <h3 id="location_pro_rea">Protein&protein reaction</h3>
+
                 <h3 id="location_pro_rea">Protein&protein interaction</h3>
 
                  
 
                  
                 <p>We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036014">BBa_K2036014</a> ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036015">BBa_K2036015</a> ) These two parts were to test the whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. </p>
+
                 <p>We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036014">BBa_K2036014</a> ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036015">BBa_K2036015</a> ) These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. </p>
 
   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png" alt="">
 
   <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/1/13/T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png" alt="">
 
                 <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that tandomly expressed CIII can efficiently protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh. </p>
 
                 <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that tandomly expressed CIII can efficiently protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh. </p>
 
               <br>
 
               <br>
                 <h3 id="location_pro&pro">Protein&promoter</h3>
+
                 <h3 id="location_pro&pro">Protein&promoter interaction </h3>
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <!-- 文字 -->
 
                 <p></p>
 
                 <p></p>
Line 270: Line 270:
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                     <div class="noteHide">
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
 
                         <!-- <h3>Web Lab</h3> -->
                         <p>CII (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036000</a>) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE. </p>
+
                         <p>CII (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000">BBa_K2036000</a>) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter pRE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as control to see if CII efficiently activate pRE. </p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/ef/T--HUST-China--CII-pRE_plate.png" alt="">
                         <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from CK.</p>
+
                         <p>According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from control group.</p>
<p>We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage are at relative low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.
+
<p>We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage is at relatively low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4b/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4b/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CII-pRE_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
Line 288: Line 288:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d1/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_plate.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/d1/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_plate.png" alt="">
                         <p>We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minute, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below). From figure we can find the fluorescence of both two groups was increasing over time and it is obvious that the test group which contains CI expressed less GFP protein than control group. The results verify the inhibition of CI to pR from a more intuitive way.</p>
+
                         <p>We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minutes, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below). From figure we can find the fluorescence of both two groups was increasing over time and it is obvious that the test group which contains CI expressed less GFP protein than control group. The results verify the inhibition of CI to pR from a more intuitive way.</p>
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/63/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
 
                         <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/6/63/T--HUST-China--Experiments-CI-pR_Flou-detec.png" alt="">
  

Revision as of 07:21, 19 October 2016

Results

Results

Eukaryote


Protein expression

Pichia pastoris are typical Eukaryotic expression host, but expressing plant genes is still a big challenge. So we firstly tested whether our three interest genes can be efficiently expressed. We measured the secretion expression of PP2CA, ABF2 and SnRK2.2. We ran a SDS-PAGE of the culture supernatants of induced cells to identify the three recombinant proteins(Fig1). Compared to vector transformed cells, 3 kinds of recombinant protein plasmids transformed cells all expressed proteins at ~80kD under induction. The shift of protein bands suggested potential glycosylation modification.

Fig1:We analyzed our protein by SDS-PAGE,this picture is our result. From left to right,DNA marker,Wild type GS115,Wild type GS115,vector,PP2CA,ABF2,SnRK2.2.


Bi-stable function:

We constructed expression plasmid and submitted this part BBa_K2036030 to the registry. But due to the limited time, its function characterization is still under test. However, our modeling simulation showed promising switch functions. See to Eukaryote circuit modeling (click here).

Prokaryote


Protein&protein interaction

We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014 ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015 ) These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition.

According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that tandomly expressed CIII can efficiently protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh.


Protein&promoter interaction

  • --CII and pRE

    more details
  • CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter pRE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag as control to see if CII efficiently activate pRE.

    According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level increased over time and it showed significant difference from control group.

    We also did Fluorescence microscope detection after 30, 120 and 240 minutes induction. According to the figture below, we can tell qualitively that pRE leakage is at relatively low level and CII can efficiently activate the promoter.

  • --CI and pR

    more details
  • CI is a repressor from bacteriophage lambda. To test its interaction with pR promoter, we constructed CI-TT-pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 and take pR-RBS-GFPLVAssrAtag-PET-Duet-1 as control to test its inhibition function.

    As the Relative Fluorescent intensity measurement data shows, CI can inhibit pR in minor degree but the leakage expression under pR can’t be ignored, so we should consider to increase the binding sites within pR or the amount of CI coding sequence in the circuit.

    We also detected GFP reporter in E.coli after induction of 20minutes, 120minutes and 240minutes through 20 times of amplification (seen from the figure below). From figure we can find the fluorescence of both two groups was increasing over time and it is obvious that the test group which contains CI expressed less GFP protein than control group. The results verify the inhibition of CI to pR from a more intuitive way.

  • --Cro and pRM

    more details
  • We characterized cro and pRM inhibition by the same method as CI and pR’s. From line chart and fluorescence detection, we can see that the test group contains cro expressed less GFP protein than control group over time. It proves that cro can effectively bind pRM to block its downstream gene’s transcription.



Tri-stable function

  • --Preliminary experiments of ptrp2

    more details
  • Ptrp2(BBa_K2036000) is an improved part from HUST-China 2015, we employed it as one of our signal sensor to test our tri-stable switch.We constructed ptrp2-GFP-pSB1C3 to determine Ptrp2 transcriptional intensity..

    According to the GFP expression curve, we choce 50μM final concentration to induce ptrp2.

  • --Preliminary experiments of LVAssrA-tag

    more details
  • In order to prove that our toolkit is efficient to switch two interest genes’ expression from GFP to RFP and to eliminate the accumulation of expressed protein to interfere our measurement. We fused a degradation tag at the amino terminal of our reporter. And we used placI from the Rgistery (BBa_J04500) to characterize the degradation tag LVAssrA.

    We use IPTG with final concentration of 1mM to induce the GFP-LVAssrAtag and measure the relative fluorescence through plate reader with Excitation light 495nm.

    Fig: LVAssrAtag degradation rate measurement under placI

    From the figure above, we are sorry to find the serious placI expression can not be prohibited from leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes. which also offered a interesting and useful tool for fastly down regulating certain target protein.

Application


  • Beta-galactosidase activity:

  • Due to the limited time before wiki freezing, we didn’t completed the test of lactic balance function of our engineered strain in vitro. But we tried to characterize plac-induced beta-galactosidase activity to prove that half of our bi-stable switch works.

    We tested enzyme activity of our strain cultured at pH6.5, 7.5 and 8.5.

    As the data shows, beta-galactosidase expression can be promoted when pH reduce to 6.5. Considering pH may affect enzyme activity, we should optimize our test method next time.


    For the results of Interlab and previous improvement,please click here