Difference between revisions of "Team:Tianjin/Note/R-R"

Line 113: Line 113:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week2 start------------------------------------------------>
 
<!------------------------------------week2 start------------------------------------------------>
 +
<div id="Week2"></div>
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<header class="entry-header">
 
<header class="entry-header">
Line 139: Line 140:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week3 start------------------------------------------------>
 
<!------------------------------------week3 start------------------------------------------------>
 +
<div id="Week3"></div>
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week3(9/7/2016-9/13/2016)</h1>
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week3(9/7/2016-9/13/2016)</h1>
Line 214: Line 216:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week4 start------------------------------------------------>       
 
<!------------------------------------week4 start------------------------------------------------>       
 
+
<div id="Week4"></div>
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week4(9/14/2016-9/20/2016)</h1>
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week4(9/14/2016-9/20/2016)</h1>
Line 272: Line 274:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week5 start------------------------------------------------>
 
<!------------------------------------week5 start------------------------------------------------>
 
+
<div id="Week5"></div>
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week5(9/21/2016-9/27/2016)</h1>
 
<h1 class="entry-title">Week5(9/21/2016-9/27/2016)</h1>
Line 320: Line 322:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week6 start------------------------------------------------>         
 
<!------------------------------------week6 start------------------------------------------------>         
   
+
  <div id="Week6"></div>
 
         <article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
         <article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<header class="entry-header">
 
<header class="entry-header">
Line 363: Line 365:
  
 
<!------------------------------------week7 start------------------------------------------------>
 
<!------------------------------------week7 start------------------------------------------------>
 
+
<div id="Week7"></div>
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<article id="post-4252" class="post-4252 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-150 tag-174 tag-xinjiang tag-173">
 
<header class="entry-header">
 
<header class="entry-header">

Revision as of 13:25, 30 September 2016

TEAM TIANJIN


Team Tianjin-Attribution

Notes

Week1(8/24/2016-8/30/2016)

  • We used PCR to amplify the CpxR promoter and RFP gene from plasmid pUC57, and then we recycled the amplified fragment from the agarose gel. Then we use Xba1 and Pst1 enzyme to cut the plasmid pUC19 and CpxR-RFP fragment.
  • We linked the cut plasmid and CpxR-RFP fragment together and transformed the recombinant plasmid to E.coli. We used PCR to amplify the PETase gene and then recycled them from the agarose gel.
  • We cultured the grown-up E.coli which had been transformed into recombinant pUC19 into liquid LB+Amp culture medium overnight.
  • We isolated the recombinant plasmid from the E.coli cultured last night. Then we use Xba1 and Pst1 enzyme to cut the plasmid to verify the plasmid was successfully constructed. The result was we succeeded.
  • We cut the recombinant plasmid pUC19 with enzyme EcoR1 and Sac1 and then we recycled it from the agarose gel. We stored the recycled product in -30℃ in order to wait for the PETase gene transformed into it.
  • In order to verify the inclusion body sensing effects of CpxR promoter, we selected a colony of E.coli with recombinant plasmid pUC19 and cultured them in 37℃ for 6 hours and then rose the temperature to 42℃ and culture it overnight.
  • The result of the verification experiment last night was unsuccessful for there was only ultralow red fluorescence was detected, which was considered the basic expression of RFP.
  • We redesigned the experiment and set 3 groups:
    1. E.coli with standard RFP gene from our own laboratory.
    2. E.coli with our recombinant plasmid pUC19 and we cultured them in 37℃ all through.
    3. E.coli with our recombinant plasmid pUC19 and we first cultured them in 37℃ and after 6 hours transferred them to 42℃.
  • The result was still unsuccessful for the 2nd and 3rd group showed ultralow red fluorescence and only 1st group showed high enough red fluorescence.
  • We redesigned the experiment again. We decided to transformed the recombinant plasmid pUC19 and pET21A which was from the protein modification group and had PETase gene in it into E.coli at the same time.
  • We cut the pUC57 with enzyme Xba1 and Pst1 and recycle the skeleton part from the agarose gel.
  • Show More IMG_2956

    Week2(8/31/2016-9/6/2016)

  • Synechococcus sp PCC 7942 had no signals of life.

  • IMG_2956


    Week3(9/7/2016-9/13/2016)

  • pMV-G19
  • pMV-G15
  • Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • Plasmids were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Amplification of 19 and 15 with Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase out of E.coli
  • 19 amplification at 65.0°C with 19.rev/fwd primes.
  • PCR worked, positive control worked, no amplification of 19.
  • 15 amplification at 65.0°C with 15.rev/fwd primes.
  • PCR worked, positive control worked, no amplification of 15.
  • A product length of 900 bp was expected. The gel shows that most plasmids seem to be correct.
  • This result was confirmed by sequencing.
  • The fragments of 19 and 15 were purified with PCR Purification Kit.
  • Show More Ligation of 15 with 19
  • We add a single 3`-adenine overhang to each end of the fragment of 19 and then purified with DNA Purification Kit.
  • 19 was ligated into T vectors via TA clone and transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • A colony PCR was performed with five colonies.
  • Gel electrophoresis showed that 5 colonies were positive for insertion of 19. Two of these colonies containing 19 were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • 15 gene fragment was phosphorylated.
  • Plasmids containing T vector with 19(pT-19)were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Mono-restriction digest of pT-19 with stu I.
  • The enzyme-digested product was dephosphorylation.
  • Dephosphorylated plasmid and phosphorylated gene 15 were connected.
  • Ligation product was transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • A colony PCR was performed with twelve colonies.
  • Gel electrophoresis showed that 2 colonies were positive for connecting the plasmid and gene fragment. These two colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • Plasmids with correct sequence of 19-15 were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Mono-restriction digest of pT-19-15 with Nru I.
  • The enzyme-digested product was dephosphorylation.
  • Show More IMG_2956

    Week4(9/14/2016-9/20/2016)

  • Colonies containing gene 13 were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • Plasmids were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Amplification of 13 with Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase out of E.coli
  • 13 amplification at 65.0°C with 13.rev/fwd primes
  • PCR worked, positive control worked, no amplification of 13
  • The fragments of 13 were purified with PCR Purification Kit.
  • 13 gene fragment was phosphorylated.
  • Show More Insertion of Ni promoter and ligation of 13-19-15
  • Ni inducible promoter was ligated into pCPC-3301 vector.
  • Phosphorylated 13 was ligated into pT-19-15 and transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • Single colonies were obtained by plating.
  • A colony PCR of Ni inducible promoter(pCPC-3301-Ni) was performed with 12 colonies.
  • Two of the successful ones were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • A colony PCR of pT-13-19-15 was performed with 7 colonies.
  • Two of the successful ones were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • Two kinds of plasmids were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Show More

    Week5(9/21/2016-9/27/2016)

  • Plasmids pT-13-19-15 were handed in for sequencing, which confirmed its correctness.
  • The sequencing results for both of them were error.
  • Colonies containing Ni inducible promoter were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • PCR was performed to check if the gene fragments were ligated correctly.
  • 13_ fwd and 15_rev on pT-13-19-15
    Gel electrophoresis showed that it failed.
  • Plasmids pCPC-3031-Ni were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • Several PCRs were performed to check if the gene fragments were ligated correctly.
  • 1.13_fwd and 13_rev on pT-13-19-15
    2.19_fwd and 19_rev on pT-13-19-15
    3.15_fwd and 15_rev on pT-13-19-15
    4.13_fwd and 19_rev on pT-13-19-15
    5.19_fwd and 15_rev on pT-13-19-15
    6.13_ wd and 15_rev on pT-13-19-15
    The fourth and sixth ones were not successful.
  • Repetition: Phosphorylated 13 was ligated into pT-19-15 and transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • Repetition: Several PCRs were performed to check if the gene fragments were ligated correctly.
  • 1.13_fwd and 13_rev on pT-13-19-15
    2.13_fwd and 19_rev on pT-13-19-15
    The second one was failed.

    Week6(9/28/2016-10/2/2016)

  • Medium preparation :BG-11.
  • 19_ fwd and 15_rev were used to amplify 19-15.
  • Gel electrophoresis showed that amplification of fragments was successfull.
  • Ligated 13 and 19-15 via overlap PCR.
  • This PCR worked well and the products were extracted from the gel using a Agarose Gel DNA Extration Kit.
  • Restriction digest on pCPC-3031-Ni with Sac I.
  • The fragment 13-19-15 was ligated onto T vector and transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • A colony PCR of pT-13-19-15 was performed with 12 colonies.
  • Two of these colonies containing pT-13-19-15 were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
  • 13-19-15 gene fragment was phosphorylated.
  • Phosphorylated 13-19-15 was ligated into pCPC-3031-Ni and transformed into E.coli via heat shock.
  • Plasmids pT-13-19-15 were isolated using a miniprep kit.
  • A colony PCR of pCPC-3031-Ni-13-19-15 was performed with 12 colonies.
  • Three colonies were proved to be true. And two of them were used to inoculate overnight cultures.


    Week7(9/26/2016-10/2/2016)

  • Plasmids pT-13-19-15 were handed in for sequencing, which confirmed its correctness.
  • The sequencing results for them were correct.


    info_outline
    Notice: This page is currently under construction. Contents in this page are temporaory and will be modified several times before the final release.     — 2016 iGEM Team Tianjin