Line 325: | Line 325: | ||
We did four parallel experiments: the bacteria solutions were added by IPTG of 10^-3mol/L, arabinose of 10^-4mol/L, both of them, and neither of them. Following is the result.</br> | We did four parallel experiments: the bacteria solutions were added by IPTG of 10^-3mol/L, arabinose of 10^-4mol/L, both of them, and neither of them. Following is the result.</br> | ||
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b1/AND_gate_v3.png" width="75%"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Seeing from the figure, solutions with no inducers or only one inducer can produce little GFP fluorescence which verify the precision and feasibility of the AND gate. But, GFP fluorescence is high when only adding arabinose. This may because the leak of Plac. We will optimize our experiment by adding a weaker RBS between Plac and T7ptag. | Seeing from the figure, solutions with no inducers or only one inducer can produce little GFP fluorescence which verify the precision and feasibility of the AND gate. But, GFP fluorescence is high when only adding arabinose. This may because the leak of Plac. We will optimize our experiment by adding a weaker RBS between Plac and T7ptag. | ||
Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
6.Future Plan</br> | 6.Future Plan</br> | ||
(1)Change Promoters. Due to the inequality of these two circuits, we have constructed a plasmid (Bba_K1886016) to change the position of plac and pbad promoters. After verifying the changed logic gate, we could learn more about its precision. And thus, we can explore the influence caused by input circuits towards the whole logic gate.</br> | (1)Change Promoters. Due to the inequality of these two circuits, we have constructed a plasmid (Bba_K1886016) to change the position of plac and pbad promoters. After verifying the changed logic gate, we could learn more about its precision. And thus, we can explore the influence caused by input circuits towards the whole logic gate.</br> | ||
− | (2)Integrate with the light-induced system to verify the cipher machine’s function (first generation) | + | (2)Integrate with the light-induced system to verify the cipher machine’s function (first generation).We have already constructed a plasmid using light-induced promoter to replace an existent one. Next, after co-transformation with bacteria, we can verify the response time of the integrated system (light-induced + logic gate), and thus, verify the cipher machine’s basic function in its first generation.</br> |
− | + | (3)Integrate with the light-induced system, and the oscillation system, to verify the function of Enigma.We have already constructed a plasmid (Bba_K1886010,Bba_K1886011,Bba_K1886012,Bba_K1886013) for Enigma. Our next step is to verify its function in the microfluidics device.</br> | |
− | (3)Integrate with the light-induced system, and the oscillation system, to verify the function of Enigma | + | |
− | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="dcpt3" style="font-size:20px;line-height:1.5;font-family: 'spr';text-align:left;"> | ||
+ | <div align="left" style="font-family: 'spr';font-size:40px;border-bottom:2px solid #584b4f;">Oscillation</div> | ||
+ | To describe the single-period oscillation system in a better and more precise way, we measured pluxR promoter’s response states towards AHL of different concentration. By using PCR and one step cloning, we removed luxl gene (fig1a, fig1b), and thus the plasmid, pTD103luxI-sfGFP, was mutant. In this way, we excluded its interference to our experiment.</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | After removing luxl gene, we combined the plasmid with its specific binding inducer and conducted PCR. The results verified that we had successfully removed luxl gene in structure. After comparing the results being induced by no AHL and AHL of 10^-6M, we verified we had successfully removed luxl gene in function. Also, it had the corresponding AHL and the ability to express sfGFP. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | We did inducement experiment after constructing pluxR-sfGFP circuit. We designed a gradient from 10^-6 to 10^-11M. After a night of inducement, we harvested the cell and resuspended in PBS (pH=7.2). Also, we did two parallel experiments for each gradient, and measured the fluorescence intensity. Following is the relational graph of fluorescence intensity and the concentration of AHL (fig2). | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | We used hyperbolic curve to analyze the result. We found that pluxR began to be activated when the concentration of AHL was about 10^-9M, and began to saturate when AHL was about 10^-6M.</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | We have figured out the relationship between pluxR and AHL, and our next step was inserting single-period oscillation system into MG1655, verifying the oscillation system. After being cultivated for a whole night, the co-transformation bacteria was transferred into the 100 ml LB medium with the proportion of 1:1000. When reaching OD0.1, we took out 1ml sample every 10 minutes, diluting to the same OD value and measuring the fluorescence intensify. Following is the result (fig3).</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | Although we observed periodic oscillation, it became unstable gradually due to the increase of bacteria quantity and the accumulation of AHL.</br> | ||
+ | We designed the microfluidics device to solve this problem and repeated our experiment. We took pictures every 5 minutes and supervised the change of fluorescence intensity in each chamber. Following is the result (fig3a).</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | We then could observe a stable oscillation, and the period was about ? H. 注意这个周期还没有数据 We used image to measure the fluorescence intensity and drew the oscillation curve (fig3b). Seeing from the figure, we could find the oscillation was stable enough.</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | After the single-period oscillation was proved, we tried to test the double-period oscillation system. We inserted double-period oscillation system into MG1655. After being cultivated for a whole night, the co-transformation bacteria was transferred into the 100 ml LB medium with the proportion of 1:1000. When reaching OD0.1, we took out 1ml sample every 10 minutes, diluting to the same OD value and measuring the fluorescence intensify. Following is the result (fig3).</br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/7/78/AND_gate_v2.png" width="75%"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to the limited time, we did not realize double-period oscillation. However, after comparing our data of these two oscillation systems without microfluidics condition, we can speculate that in the microfluidics chip, the stable double-period oscillation can be realized. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <strong>Future work:</strong> | ||
+ | 1.Realize the double-period oscillation system in the microfluidics chip. And then couple these systems together: the light-induced system, the logic gate system, and the oscillation system.</br> | ||
+ | 2.Decrease the device’s scale in order to get a more stable oscillation. Also, find solutions to solve the accumulation of bacteria and other unexpected problems.</br> | ||
+ | 3.Explore the relationship between velocity of flow and the length of each period. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <strong>Consideration:</strong> | ||
+ | 1.When measuring fluorescence intensity, the first step is to do re-suspension. Otherwise, LB will affect our results.</br> | ||
+ | 2.AHL uses DMSO as solvent which is poisonous. We should improve the concentration of AHL and decrease the quantity of DMSO. When the volume fraction falls below 10%, we did not observe obvious differences.</br> | ||
+ | 3.When using microfluidics device, don’t forget to add Tween20 of 0.075% in the medium to avoid bacteria being stuck in the chip.</br> | ||
+ | 4.We recommend to use MG1655 because it grows fast and is the suitable engineering bacteria for this experiment.</br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 13:14, 19 October 2016
Light Control
We have successfully constructed plasmid used in the light-induced system and achieved co-transformation in E.coli JT2. After then, we have tested the light sensitivity and the response time.
Construction of Plasmid
(1) The construction of Part
(2) The green light system
(3) The red light system
(4) The result of co-transformation
About response
Delay
We observed that the sharp increase of fluorescence mainly happens after 3 hours. And this sharp increase is really a helpful index for us to test the system. Thus, we think the response time of TCS is between 3 to 4 hours.
In general, we have verified that these two systems are feasible. However, they did not match up to our expectations, and the results seemed far different from our references. Following are the possible reasons:
1、The results can be affected by the copy number of plasmid and the replicon’s intensity, especially for the red light TCS.
2、Maybe this is because the LED intensity was not strong enough. Also, we used LB medium and it absorbed light of different wavelength, making light attenuate too much and could not activate TCS effectively.
3、The antibiotics we used may affect the system’s expression.
Future plan
1、Decrease the leak level. In the light-induced system, the reporter gene’s leak will affect our measurement. What’s more, it may even lead to unexpected errors for users to read the information. In order to avoid such errors, we have several alternative plans:Use a new light-induced system - we have already found a system using blue light. Keep balance between every components by changing the intensity of rbs. Keep balance between every components by changing the copy number of plasmid and the replicon’s intensity.
2、Future measurement of the red light system after inserting NOT gate.
3、Mix bacteria of the green light and red light system together, and measure their response towards light.
4、Analyze the response curve, to find the optimum light intensity.
5、Replace LB medium as M9 medium and compare their results.
6、Explore the optimum quantity of antibiotics.
The key points for repeating experiment
1.When constructing plasmid, with the existence of double terminator, it is prone to appear disorder when using overlap PCR to join two segments together. Using seamless connection to construct plasmid is also prone to appear deletions of segments, and we can consider to use the method of enzyme-digestion and enzyme-connection.
2.When measuring the fluorescence expression of bacteria after co-transformation, the results are affected by medium. Thus, we recommend to centrifuge first, then use PBS buffer solution to clear the remaining medium. These two steps can be repeated by 2 times in order to preclude the effects caused by medium.
Logic Gate
Overview
We simplified the three-plasmid system based on our reference by constructing all the segments in one plasmid. And we tested in E.coli MG1655. We used arabinose promoter (PBAD) and lactose promoter (Plac) as inducers and we have verified the corresponding concentration and time.
1. Construction of Plasmid:
Part:
First, we constructed the input plasmid and output plasmid.
Input:
Oscillation
To describe the single-period oscillation system in a better and more precise way, we measured pluxR promoter’s response states towards AHL of different concentration. By using PCR and one step cloning, we removed luxl gene (fig1a, fig1b), and thus the plasmid, pTD103luxI-sfGFP, was mutant. In this way, we excluded its interference to our experiment.