Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Human Practices"

Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
<div class ="lab">
+
<div class ="lab" style="background-color:blue;">
 
<h2>Topic 1</h2>
 
<h2>Topic 1</h2>
 
<p style="display:inline;">blurb</p>
 
<p style="display:inline;">blurb</p>

Revision as of 03:08, 19 October 2016

Purdue Biomakers

Twitter

Facebook

Website

Previous Page
Next Page

Topic 1

blurb

extendedLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, decore legendos splendide an vim. Ad probo liberavisse pri. Ut semper ancillae comprehensam mei, ignota temporibus ne qui. Et vis hinc sonet dolorem, nam et modus sonet deserunt. An deserunt recusabo assentior nam, impetus nonumes est cu. No vis suas nullam ubique, ad hinc vulputate sit. Sit inani nostrum cu, vix aperiri equidem democritum te, aliquid appareat sapientem duo no. Tale vituperata at mei, sea ei inani tractatos, te sit iuvaret numquam pertinacia. Ius movet nihil ubique at, ferri illud no mel. Cu eos modus copiosae, ei nisl cibo mea. Melius nominavi in vis, oblique commune id mea. Tollit omittam invenire sed at.

iGEM teams are leading in the area of Human Practices because they conduct their projects within a social/environmental context, to better understand issues that might influence the design and use of their technologies.

Teams work with students and advisors from the humanities and social sciences to explore topics concerning ethical, legal, social, economic, safety or security issues related to their work. Consideration of these Human Practices is crucial for building safe and sustainable projects that serve the public interest.

For more information, please see the Human Practices Hub.

iGEM Database

In an attempt to improve the iGEM experience for future teams, we identified a problem central to the iGEM community: the lack of a comprehensive project database. An easy way to search and explore all previous projects performed by our community is necessary. This is particularly useful in the case of building off of the work of others. As science is an iterative process in which all research is built on the backs of other research, a way to navigate previous work is highly useful. Many of us can agree that the wiki system has its benefits; however, few people agree that the information they contain is easily searchable. In an attempt to solve this problem we formed the idea of a database where the most important information of each project could be condensed down into a digestible format. The information we included in each database entry is listed below. You can find our database at www.igem.tech

Each team wiki was cataloged with the following data points:

  • Project Title
  • Team Name
  • Year
  • Team Type
  • Team Size
  • Project Summary
  • Keywords
  • Chassis
  • Track
  • Link to Wiki
  • Medals earned
  • Awards
  • Benchmark meet
  • Finished Parts
  • Killswitch

We hope that a comprehensive and indexable iGEM wiki database will make it easier for teams to build off of the works of others so that we are not reinventing the wheel every year.

Note

You must fill out this page in order to be considered for all awards for Human Practices:

  • Human Practices silver medal criterion
  • Human Practices gold medal criterion
  • Best Integrated Human Practices award
  • Best Education and Public Engagement award
Some Human Practices topic areas
  • Philosophy
  • Public Engagement / Dialogue
  • Education
  • Product Design
  • Scale-Up and Deployment Issues
  • Environmental Impact
  • Ethics
  • Safety
  • Security
  • Public Policy
  • Law and Regulation
  • Risk Assessment
What should we write about on this page?

On this page, you should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, and document any special activities you did (such as visiting experts, talking to lawmakers, or doing public engagement).

Inspiration

Read what other teams have done: