Difference between revisions of "Team:Purdue/Results"

Line 25: Line 25:
 
<p>Plasmid DNA was then obtained for colonies resulting from transformations and brought to the Purdue Genomics Core Facility for low throughput Sanger sequencing. </p>
 
<p>Plasmid DNA was then obtained for colonies resulting from transformations and brought to the Purdue Genomics Core Facility for low throughput Sanger sequencing. </p>
  
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/e/e3/T--Purdue--results_figure3.jpg" width="800"></center>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/2/25/T--Purdue--PPK2_seq_align.png" width="800"></center>
<p><center><b>Figure 3</b>: The results of Sanger sequencing. The results for transformations of PPK2 homolog C, PPX2 homolog C, and Pit A into PSB1A3 are shown on top left, middle, and right, respectively. The results for transformations of PPX2 and PPGK into PSB1C3 are shown on the bottom left and right, respectively.</center></p>
+
<p><center><b>Figure 3.</b>: The results of Sanger sequencing for the transformation of PPK2 homolog C in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicates that PPK2 homolog C plasmid has the correct sequence.</center></p>
  
<p>The sequences produced by Sanger sequencing were then aligned with the sequence of the desired insert. Of all transformations with PSB1A3, only PPK2 homolog C and PPX2 were verified via plasmid sequencing. As shown in the sequencing chromatogram for Pit A into PSB1A3, the results of Sanger sequencing the other samples of transformations with PSB1A3 did not result in enough high quality bases to accurately obtain a sequence. We later determined that this was due to errors in 3A assembly that allowed for colonies with a plasmid backbone other than PSB1A3 to form. When transformations with PSB1C3 were sequences, only PPX2 was verified to have the correct insert present in the plasmid. Still, as shown in the sequencing chromatogram for PPGK into PSB1C3, the sequencing results still contained a large amount of high quality bases. The sequences for the incorrect samples with PSB1C3 were then aligned with the sequence for PSB1C3 in order to determine that the sequence was PSB1C3 that did not contain an insert, and were likely a result of self-ligation.</p>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/4/4b/T--Purdue--PPX2_PSB1A3.png" width="800"></center>
 +
<p><center><b>Figure 3.b.</b>: The results of Sanger sequencing for the transformations of PPX2 homolog in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicate that the PPX2 homolog contains the correct sequence.</center></p>
 +
 
 +
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/0e/T--Purdue--ppx2_chlor.png" width="800"></center>
 +
<p><center><b>Figure 3.c.</b>: he results of Sanger sequencing for the transformations of PPX2 homolog in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicate that the PPX2 homolog contains the correct sequence.</center></p>
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>

Revision as of 03:15, 20 October 2016

Purdue Biomakers

Twitter

Facebook

Website

Results


Transformations into E. coli

Figure 1: Transformation of PPX2 homolog on PSB1A3 plasmid into E. coli grown on an LB agar plate with ampicillin.

Figure 2: Transformation of PPK2 homolog C on PSB1A3 plasmid into E. coli grown on an LB agar plate with ampicillin.

Figure 1 and Figure 2 demonstrate the growth of modified E. coli on LB agar plates containing ampicillin. This antibiotic was shown to be effective in controlling the growth of bacteria that did not take up the modified plasmid with antibiotic resistance, as no growth was found on the negative control. The success of these transformations, as confirmed through plasmid sequencing, is discussed below.


Plasmid Sequencing

Plasmid DNA was then obtained for colonies resulting from transformations and brought to the Purdue Genomics Core Facility for low throughput Sanger sequencing.

Figure 3.: The results of Sanger sequencing for the transformation of PPK2 homolog C in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicates that PPK2 homolog C plasmid has the correct sequence.

Figure 3.b.: The results of Sanger sequencing for the transformations of PPX2 homolog in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicate that the PPX2 homolog contains the correct sequence.

Figure 3.c.: he results of Sanger sequencing for the transformations of PPX2 homolog in the plasmid PSB1A3 indicate that the PPX2 homolog contains the correct sequence.


Analysis of Phosphorus Uptake, Accumulation, and Exportation

Phosphorus Uptake and Export Assay

Figure 4: The amount of extracellular total phosphorus in Tris-HCl buffered minimal media after extended 72-hour phosphorus transportation assay with E. coli.

Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was used to quantify the importation and exportation of phosphorus by modified and unmodified E. coli with results detailed in Figure 4. Unmodified E. coli served as a negative control to which PPX2 in PSB1A3 backbone was compared. The results, reflective of 72 hours of E. coli suspension in Tris-HCl buffered minimal media, indicate that PPX2 effectively exported phosphorus from the cell compared to the exportation of phosphorus from unmodified E. coli because PPX2 culture demonstrated a higher extracellular phosphorus concentration.

Polyphosphate Accumulation Assay

Figure 5A standard curve for amount of phosphate per 300 µl of solution was generated using sodium phosphate glass type 45. The coefficient of determination (R2), at 0.975, is relatively close to 1, which indicates that the linear regression is a suitable equation for estimating the relationship between concentration of polyphosphate and absorbance at 630 nm. The suitability of the linear regression is also supported by the root mean square error, which, at 0.02, is relatively close to 0.

Figure 6: the results indicate that the samples for E. coli containing PPK2 C (both PSB1C3 and PSB1A3), PPX2 (both PSB1C3 and PSB1A3), and PPGK accumulate less polyphosphate than unmodified E. coli, and samples for E. coli containing Pit homolog A and PPGK ATPI accumulate more polyphosphate than the unmodified E. coli.

These results indicate that PPX2 and PPGK works as expected, as PPX2 hydrolyzes phosphate to produce orthophosphate, and PPGK transfers a phosphate group from polyphosphate to glucose. While PPK2 homolog C’s preference for polyphosphate hydrolysis or synthesis is unknown, the low concentration of polyphosphate in cells containing PPK2 homolog C suggests that PPK2 C favors polyphosphate hydrolysis to phosphorylate nucleoside diphosphates (or nucleoside monophosphates). Meanwhile, these results also suggest that Pit A is working as expected, as Pit A is predicted to transport phosphate into the cell. PPGK ATPI is not working as expected, as PPGK ATPI, like PPGK, transfers a phosphate group from polyphosphate to glucose.

In the future, we should extract polyphosphate granules from a large sample of unmodified E. coli in order to obtain a normal distribution curve to which our modified samples could be compared.


Immobilization in Sol-gel beads

From the outset of this project, our team recognized the absolute importance of maintaining biosafety both in the lab and in the real-world application of our problem. Although 5-a strains of E. coli like the ones used in our project are non-pathogenic, tests for water contamination are nondiscriminatory as to strain or viability of any bacteria present in water. As such, kill switches alone would not be enough to address concerns around the safe application of our phosphate reclaim modules (bioreactors, buoys, etc.).

Instead we needed a means of isolating our constructs from their treated effluent without sealing our constructs away from treating influent in the first place. To do so we settled upon a technique known as sol-gel immobilization. This technique, in which cells are isolated in highly porous silica matrices (xerogels) through an epoxy-like process allows for the easy diffusion of nutrients into and out of cells without the diffusion of cells from the matrices.

After attempting to isolate unmodified and RFP-expressing E. coli as negative and positive controls respectively, we imaged the two xerogels through fluorescence microscopy and affirmed that yes, in fact, we were able to immobilize E. coli.


Bioreactor Flow Rates



References

[1] JMP®, Version 12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2007