Difference between revisions of "Team:LambertGA/Notebook"

 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 84: Line 84:
  
  
##MainTitle {
+
#MainTitle {
 
padding-top: 50px;
 
padding-top: 50px;
 
padding-bottom: 7px;
 
padding-bottom: 7px;
Line 335: Line 335:
 
     margin: 10px 0px 0px 10px;
 
     margin: 10px 0px 0px 10px;
 
   }
 
   }
 +
.rotate90 {
 +
    -webkit-transform: rotate(90deg);
 +
    -moz-transform: rotate(90deg);
 +
    -o-transform: rotate(90deg);
 +
    -ms-transform: rotate(90deg);
 +
    transform: rotate(90deg);
 +
}
  
 
</style>
 
</style>
Line 356: Line 363:
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Team" class="dropbtn">Team</a>
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Team" class="dropbtn">Team</a>
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 +
      <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Team">Team</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Collaborations">Collaborations</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Collaborations">Collaborations</a>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
Line 373: Line 381:
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Parts" class="dropbtn">Parts</a>
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Parts" class="dropbtn">Parts</a>
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 +
      <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Parts">Parts</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Basic_Part">Basic Parts</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Basic_Part">Basic Parts</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Composite_Part">Composite Parts</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Composite_Part">Composite Parts</a>
Line 382: Line 391:
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Human_Practices" class="dropbtn">Human Practices</a>
 
       <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Human_Practices" class="dropbtn">Human Practices</a>
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 
       <div class="dropdown-content">
 +
      <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/Human_Practices">Human Practices</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/HP/Silver">Silver</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/HP/Silver">Silver</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/HP/Gold">Gold</a>
 
       <a class="drplink" style="transition: color 0.5s ease-in-out;" href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:LambertGA/HP/Gold">Gold</a>
Line 403: Line 413:
  
 
<section>
 
<section>
<div class="container">
+
<!--<div class="container">-->
<div class="row">
+
<!--<div class="row">-->
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-10">
+
<!--<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-10">-->
 +
 
 +
<div class="column full_size" style="width:75%; margin:auto;" >
 
<div>
 
<div>
  
Line 416: Line 428:
  
 
<!--<p style="font-size:20px;">-->
 
<!--<p style="font-size:20px;">-->
<button class="accordion">Week 1 (Aug 8):</button>
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 1 (Aug 8):</font>
<div class="panel">
+
 
<br>
 
<br>
Safety procedures and aseptic technique was reviewed by our iGEM supervisor: Janet Standeven.
+
As a part of our biotechnology pathway’s curriculum, we reviewed basic safety procedures and aseptic technique with our advisor Janet Standeven.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
</div>
 
  
<button class="accordion">Week 2 (Aug 15):</button>
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 2 (Aug 15):</font>
<div class="panel">
+
 
<br>
 
<br>
This week was subjected to ligating two of our three parts of the genetic construct together: <b>P--Lambda-R--LacI--Tspurple (LAA/DAS) and ROO11--ClpXP--CI</b>
+
Our focus this week was to ligate two of the three parts in our genetic construct: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA/DAS and R0011--ClpXP--CI; however, we did not ligate the part without any degradation tag.  After the ligations, the constructs were transformed into DH10 E. coli cells, but we were unsuccessful.  
<br>
+
After ligation was complete the the genetic constructs were then transformed into separate DH10 <i>E. coli</i> cells  
+
Results: Unsuccessful for unknown reasons. Looking back it was most likely a procedure-error or a lack of a B0034 RBS binding site
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 3 (Aug 22):</button>
+
 
<div class="panel">
+
<font color = "D49AE6"> Week 3 (Aug 22): </font>
 
<br>
 
<br>
The previous transformation and ligation was unsuccessful due to the lack of ribosomal binding sites in the genetic constructs
+
Due to the unsuccessful transformations seen the previous week, we re-attempted our workflow (digest, ligation, transformation) of both parts. In addition, we ligated and transformed our third construct: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple and R0011--ClpXP--CI.
<br>
+
We were required to re-digest, re-transform and re-ligate the <b>P--Lambda-R--LacI--Tspurple (LAA/DAS) and ROO11--ClpXP--CI</b>
+
<br>
+
Transformation and ligation of the third part: genetic construct without a degradation tag on the Tspurple Protein
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 4 (Aug 29):</button>
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 4 (Aug 29):</font>
<div class="panel">
+
 
<br>
 
<br>
The continuation of the re-ligations and re-transformations during week 3 were ultimately unsuccessful due to RFP(red fluorescent protein) contamination and/or lack of functioning genetic construct  
+
Transformations were ultimately unsuccessful because of RFP (red fluorescent protein) contamination.  In addition, we miniprepped and nanodropped our genetic construct without the present degradation tag, which was in the 1C3 backbone.
<br>
+
Minipreped and nanodroped the genetic construct without a present degradation tag in the backbone 1C3.
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
</div>
 
  
 
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 5 (Sep 5):</font>
<button class="accordion">Week 5 (Sep 5):</button>
+
<div class="panel">
+
Further detection of previous errors
+
<br><br>
+
Liquid culture of genetic construct without degradation tag
+
<br><br>
+
Inoculation of RFP and previous TS purple colonies
+
<br><br>
+
Performed digests of p-lambda-r/LacI,  Ts purple (no deg tag/ DAS/ LAA), R0011-ClpXP-CI, R0011-ClpXP, and CI.
+
<br>
+
Show picture of gel
+
 
<br>
 
<br>
Conclusion: TsPurple(no deg tag/ DAS/LAA), R0011-ClpXP, and CI digests were of expected sizes and p-lambda-r-LacI, and R0011-ClpXP-CI digests were unsuccessful  
+
Due to several failures over the past few weeks, we attempted to detect previous errors by re-ligating and re-transforming the parts together using a different stock of P-lambda-R--LacI that was previously confirmed over the summer.  Our results indicated faint, purple cells for our construct (P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--R0011--ClpXP--CI), but no color was shown for the DAS and LAA cells after the transformation.  In addition, we inoculated liquid cultures of our genetic constructs from the previous week’s transformations, including the genetic construct without the present degradation tag, the RFP colonies, and previous tsPurple colonies.  Digests were performed of P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, R0011--ClpXP, and CI.  After analyzing the gel, we concluded the tsPurple with no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, R0011--ClpXP, and CI were of expected sizes, but the P-lambda-R--LacI and R0011--ClpXP--CI digests were unsuccessful.  Lastly, the following backbones were successfully digested for future ligations: 1A3, 1C3, 1K3, and 1T3.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Digested 1A3, 1C3, 1K3, and 1T3 backbones for future ligations
 
<br>
 
Show gel
 
<br>
 
Conclusion: all successful
 
<br><br>
 
Due to several unsuccessful procedures, we re-ligated p-lamba-r/LacI + Ts purple (no deg tag/DAS/LAA) and R0011/ClpXP + CI using a different stock of p-lambda-r-LacI that was previously confirmed
 
<br>
 
The above ligations were also transformed
 
<br>
 
Results: very faint cells for p-lamba-r/LacI + Ts purple (no deg tag)  and no color for DAS or LAA cells
 
  
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 6 (Sep 12):</button>
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 6 (Sep 12):</font>
<div class="panel">
+
Our constructs were sent out for sequencing; we found out that there was not an RBS between LacI and tsPurple.  These results explained our transformation results from last week: while the cells would turn purple via read-through transcription, the cells with no degradation tag would become slightly purple, and the cells with degradation tags (DAS or LAA) would not have any color.  At the same time of sending and receiving our sequences, we also hydrated B0034 from the iGEM kit of parts.
We sent out constructs for sequencing and found that our constructs did not have an RBS between LacI and Tspurple, so our cells would turn purple via read-through transcription, meaning only cells with TsPurple (no deg Tag) would be slightly purple but a deg tagged TsPurple would result in no color at all.
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
B0034 was hydrated from iGEM kit of parts
 
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
  
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 7 (Sep 19):</button>
 
<div class="panel">
 
  
Digestion of TsPurple (no deg tag/DAS/LAA) and ligation into 1C3 vector. Then we transformed into NEB 10-beta cells
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 7 (Sep 19):</font>
 +
We had two sets of parts being constructed during this week.  First, tsPurple with no degradation tag, DAS, and LAA were successfully digested and ligated into 1C3 backbones; after we transformed these vectors into NEB 10-beta cells.  Second, we successfully miniprepped and nanodropped our B0034 part.  After, we digested, ligated, and transformed B0034 and tsPurple with no degradation tag into 1C3.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Digestion of B0034 and TsPurple (no deg tag/DAS/LAA)
 
<br>
 
Results: all successful
 
<br><br>
 
Ligation of B0034 & TsPurple (no deg tag/DAS/LAA)
 
<br><br>
 
Transformation of B0034 and TsPurple (no tag/DAS/LAA)
 
<br>
 
Results: Successful growth
 
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 8 (Sep 26):</button>
 
<div class="panel">
 
  
Fall Break (We did stuff here)
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 8 (Sep 26):</font>
 +
Despite Lambert High School having fall break, our team was hard at work.  We ligated and and transformed P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, but the cells did not turn purple as expected.  Additionally, we went to Georgia Tech to practice presenting and to discuss our progress with Dr. Styczynski and Monica McNerney.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 9 (Oct 3):</button>
 
<div class="panel">
 
  
Decided to use premade GFP constructs as a proof-of-concept while simultaneously building our Tspurple constructs  
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 9 (Oct 3):</font>
<br><br>
+
As a team, we decided to use premade GFP constructs that were built over the summer as our proof-of-concept.  By doing so, we can verify results while simultaneously assembling our tsPurple constructs.  After transforming our GFP constructs into DH10 cells, Keio Wild cells, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells, we sent the GFP constructs out for sequencing.
Transformed GFP constructs into three types of cells: DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP Knockout
+
<br><br><center>
<br>
+
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/94/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_all.jpg" style="width: 400px; height: 533px;">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/94/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_all.jpg" style="width: 400px; height: 533px;">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/90/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_DH10.jpg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/90/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_DH10.jpg">
Line 534: Line 485:
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bf/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_Keio_Wild.jpg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/bf/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_Keio_Wild.jpg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fc/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_Keio_ClpP.jpg">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/f/fc/T--LambertGA--GFP_Constructs_in_Keio_ClpP.jpg">
<br>
+
</center>
Results: Mostly Unsuccessful. Many of the Transformations were effective, but the construct was not functioning as it should have been
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
GFP Constructs sent for sequencing to determine if there is an error in the construct
 
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 10 (Oct 10):</button>
+
 
<div class="panel">
+
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 10 (Oct 10):</font>
<br>
+
In the beginning of the week, we ligated P-lambda-R--LacI and B0034 together.  We transformed three constructs: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA, P-lambda-R--LacI biobrick in 3T5, and P-lambda-r--RFP in 3T5.  Although we determined that our P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA construct was trash DNA, we were able to successfully obtain purple cells with the correct tsPurple construct P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA--R0011--ClpXP--CI.  As for our GFP constructs, we digested GFP with no degradation tag/DAS/LAA and ligated the parts in 1C3 backbone.  These vectors were transformed into DH10 competent cells.  Colonies of each construct in the three cell types were then inoculated into liquid culture in triplicates, and they were also induced with different levels of IPTG (no IPTG, 10uM IPTG, 100uM IPTG, and 1mM IPTG).  Although they grew properly, we were unable to access a plate reader in time to analyze the levels of fluorescence from each tube.  In addition, a series of transformations were done to verify that the constructs were properly made: P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS in 1AK3, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS in 1C3, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1AK3, and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1C3.  From the P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1C3 construct, it was hard to identify colonies that had the correct green morphology, so a colony PCR was performed; we were able to verify that we had chosen the correct colony with GFP.  From there, we inoculated the remaining colony into liquid culture and prepared for a miniprep.
Ligation of P-lambda-R-LacI and B0034
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Digestion of P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (no tag/ DAS/LAA) and ligation into 1C3 Backbone. We then transformed into DH10 competent cells
 
<br><br>
 
Liquid cultures of each GFP construct in each cell was made with varying levels of IPTG; No IPTG, 10 uM, 100 uM, 1 mM, in triplicate
 
<br><br>
 
Transformation of:
 
<br>
 
<ul>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (DAS) [from past miniprep]  in 1AK3</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (DAS) [from ligation] in 1C3</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (LAA) [from past miniprep]  in 1AK3</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (LAA) [from ligation] in 1C3</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--TsPurple (LAA) [Curious if it worked] in 1AK3</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI Biobrick in 3T5</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--RFP in 3T5</li>
 
<li>R0011--ClpXP--CI Biobrick in 1AK3</li>
 
</ul>
 
<br>
 
All successful with an exception of P-lambda-R--LacI--TsPurple (LAA), which concluded that it was trash DNA and was thrown out. <b>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (no tag/DAS) [from ligation] in 1C3</b> were innoculated into liquid cultures to miniprep. Morphology was difficult to determine in <b>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (LAA) in 1C3</b> as the GFP was very hard to detect. To make sure we picked a colony that had the insert, we performed a colony PCR
 
<br>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/33/T--LambertGA--Colony_PCR_PLR_LACI-GFP%28LAA%29.jpg">
 
Results: Colony picked had correct DNA insert. Inoculated liquid culture from colony to miniprep.
 
<br><br>
 
Purple cells were finally achieved due to  successful TsPurple constructs of:
 
<b>P-lambda-R--LacI--TsPurple(no tag/DAS/LAA)--R0011--ClpXP--CI</b>
 
<br><br>
 
</div>
 
  
  
<button class="accordion">Week 11 (Oct 17):</button>
 
<div class="panel">
 
<br>
 
Successful miniprep of R0011--ClpXP--CI and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXP--CI
 
<br>
 
R0011--ClpXP--CI had a final concentration of 175.8 ng/uL
 
P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXP--CI had a final concentration of 79.1 ng/uL
 
<br>
 
Both constructs were sent for sequencing
 
<br><br>
 
Inoculation of 58 tubes in Plain LB
 
<ul>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP into DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP cells as well as induced into 0 uM and 100 uM IPTG levels in triplicates (18)</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (DAS) into DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP cells as well as induced into 0 uM and 100 uM IPTG levels  in triplicates (18)</li>
 
<li>P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP (LAA)--ClpXP--CI into DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP cells as well as induced into 0 uM and 100 uM IPTG levels in triplicates (18)</li>
 
<br>
 
<li>Four controls: plain LB, DH10 cells, Keio Wild type cells, and Keio ClpP cells</li>
 
</ul>
 
  
 +
<font color = "D49AE6">Week 11 (Oct 17):</font>
 +
We were able to successfully miniprep R0011--ClpXP--CI and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXP--CI, with final concentrations of 175.8 ng/uL and 79.1 ng/uL, respectively.  Both constructs were sent for sequencing.  In addition, we inoculated liquid cultures into 58 tubes of LB.  We inoculated P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS, and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA--ClpXP--CI into DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells in triplicates.  In addition, we induced them into 0uM and 100uM IPTG levels.  We also had four controls: a tube of plain LB, DH10 cells, Keio Wild cells, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells.  Although the cells grew, none of the tubes showed fluorescence.  As a result, we did another set of liquid cultures of P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA--ClpXPCI in Keio Wild cells induced with 0uM, 10uM, and 100uM of IPTG into CArbenicillin LB.  We also inoculated P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXPCI in Keio Wild cells induced with 0uM, 10uM, and 100uM of IPTG into Tetracycline LB.  Results TBD (Ms. Standeven is taking these down to the plate reader tonight). 
 +
<br><br><br><center>
 +
<img id="image_canv" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/d/db/T--LambertGA--Week11_miniprep_R0011_ClpXP_CI.jpg" class="rotate90">
 +
<img id="image_canv" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/5/56/T--LambertGA--Week11_miniprep_P_lambda_R_LacI_GFP_ClpXP_CI.jpg" class="rotate90">
 +
<br><br><br><i>Week 11 Miniprep R0011--ClpXP--CI and Week 11 Miniprep P-Lambda-R-LacI--GFP--ClpXP-CI</i><br>
 +
</center>
  
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
  
  
Line 603: Line 511:
 
</div></div></div></div>
 
</div></div></div></div>
 
</section>
 
</section>
 +
</div>
 +
<br><br>
  
  
<script>
 
var acc = document.getElementsByClassName("accordion");
 
var i;
 
 
for (i = 0; i < acc.length; i++) {
 
    acc[i].onclick = function(){
 
        this.classList.toggle("active");
 
        this.nextElementSibling.classList.toggle("show");
 
  }
 
}
 
</script>
 
</div>
 
 
<center><h2 style="text-align:center" color: #D49AE6 > View Our Team's Notebooks</h2></center>
 
<center><h2 style="text-align:center" color: #D49AE6 > View Our Team's Notebooks</h2></center>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
<center>
 
<center>
 +
 
<div id="pdf-display-container">
 
<div id="pdf-display-container">
 
   <div id="pdf-viewer-container">
 
   <div id="pdf-viewer-container">
Line 625: Line 524:
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
<i>Nivi Minjur's Notebook</i>
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
<div id="pdf-display-container">
 +
  <div id="pdf-viewer-container">
 +
    <iframe id="pdf-viewer" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b9/T--LambertGA--laurennotebookfinal.pdf" frameborder="0"> Nivi Minjur's Notebook</iframe>
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<i>Lauren Hong's Notebook</i>
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
<div id="pdf-display-container">
 +
  <div id="pdf-viewer-container">
 +
    <iframe id="pdf-viewer" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9d/T--LambertGA--arjunnotebookfinal.pdf" frameborder="0"> Nivi Minjur's Notebook</iframe>
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
 +
<i>Arjun Bhatt's Notebook</i>
 +
<br><br><br>
 
</center>
 
</center>
<div id="sponsors-bottom">
 
  
 +
 +
<div id="sponsors-bottom">
 
<a href="http://www.forsyth.k12.ga.us/lhs"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9e/T--LambertGA--longhorn_iGEM_logo.png" class="transparent" style="height:100px;padding:20px;"></a>
 
<a href="http://www.forsyth.k12.ga.us/lhs"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/9/9e/T--LambertGA--longhorn_iGEM_logo.png" class="transparent" style="height:100px;padding:20px;"></a>
  

Latest revision as of 03:27, 20 October 2016



Notebook


Week 1 (Aug 8):
As a part of our biotechnology pathway’s curriculum, we reviewed basic safety procedures and aseptic technique with our advisor Janet Standeven.

Week 2 (Aug 15):
Our focus this week was to ligate two of the three parts in our genetic construct: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA/DAS and R0011--ClpXP--CI; however, we did not ligate the part without any degradation tag. After the ligations, the constructs were transformed into DH10 E. coli cells, but we were unsuccessful.

Week 3 (Aug 22):
Due to the unsuccessful transformations seen the previous week, we re-attempted our workflow (digest, ligation, transformation) of both parts. In addition, we ligated and transformed our third construct: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple and R0011--ClpXP--CI.

Week 4 (Aug 29):
Transformations were ultimately unsuccessful because of RFP (red fluorescent protein) contamination. In addition, we miniprepped and nanodropped our genetic construct without the present degradation tag, which was in the 1C3 backbone.

Week 5 (Sep 5):
Due to several failures over the past few weeks, we attempted to detect previous errors by re-ligating and re-transforming the parts together using a different stock of P-lambda-R--LacI that was previously confirmed over the summer. Our results indicated faint, purple cells for our construct (P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--R0011--ClpXP--CI), but no color was shown for the DAS and LAA cells after the transformation. In addition, we inoculated liquid cultures of our genetic constructs from the previous week’s transformations, including the genetic construct without the present degradation tag, the RFP colonies, and previous tsPurple colonies. Digests were performed of P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, R0011--ClpXP, and CI. After analyzing the gel, we concluded the tsPurple with no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, R0011--ClpXP, and CI were of expected sizes, but the P-lambda-R--LacI and R0011--ClpXP--CI digests were unsuccessful. Lastly, the following backbones were successfully digested for future ligations: 1A3, 1C3, 1K3, and 1T3.

Week 6 (Sep 12): Our constructs were sent out for sequencing; we found out that there was not an RBS between LacI and tsPurple. These results explained our transformation results from last week: while the cells would turn purple via read-through transcription, the cells with no degradation tag would become slightly purple, and the cells with degradation tags (DAS or LAA) would not have any color. At the same time of sending and receiving our sequences, we also hydrated B0034 from the iGEM kit of parts.

Week 7 (Sep 19): We had two sets of parts being constructed during this week. First, tsPurple with no degradation tag, DAS, and LAA were successfully digested and ligated into 1C3 backbones; after we transformed these vectors into NEB 10-beta cells. Second, we successfully miniprepped and nanodropped our B0034 part. After, we digested, ligated, and transformed B0034 and tsPurple with no degradation tag into 1C3.

Week 8 (Sep 26): Despite Lambert High School having fall break, our team was hard at work. We ligated and and transformed P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA, but the cells did not turn purple as expected. Additionally, we went to Georgia Tech to practice presenting and to discuss our progress with Dr. Styczynski and Monica McNerney.

Week 9 (Oct 3): As a team, we decided to use premade GFP constructs that were built over the summer as our proof-of-concept. By doing so, we can verify results while simultaneously assembling our tsPurple constructs. After transforming our GFP constructs into DH10 cells, Keio Wild cells, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells, we sent the GFP constructs out for sequencing.




Week 10 (Oct 10): In the beginning of the week, we ligated P-lambda-R--LacI and B0034 together. We transformed three constructs: P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA, P-lambda-R--LacI biobrick in 3T5, and P-lambda-r--RFP in 3T5. Although we determined that our P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--LAA construct was trash DNA, we were able to successfully obtain purple cells with the correct tsPurple construct P-lambda-R--LacI--tsPurple--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA--R0011--ClpXP--CI. As for our GFP constructs, we digested GFP with no degradation tag/DAS/LAA and ligated the parts in 1C3 backbone. These vectors were transformed into DH10 competent cells. Colonies of each construct in the three cell types were then inoculated into liquid culture in triplicates, and they were also induced with different levels of IPTG (no IPTG, 10uM IPTG, 100uM IPTG, and 1mM IPTG). Although they grew properly, we were unable to access a plate reader in time to analyze the levels of fluorescence from each tube. In addition, a series of transformations were done to verify that the constructs were properly made: P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS in 1AK3, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS in 1C3, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1AK3, and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1C3. From the P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA in 1C3 construct, it was hard to identify colonies that had the correct green morphology, so a colony PCR was performed; we were able to verify that we had chosen the correct colony with GFP. From there, we inoculated the remaining colony into liquid culture and prepared for a miniprep.

Week 11 (Oct 17): We were able to successfully miniprep R0011--ClpXP--CI and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXP--CI, with final concentrations of 175.8 ng/uL and 79.1 ng/uL, respectively. Both constructs were sent for sequencing. In addition, we inoculated liquid cultures into 58 tubes of LB. We inoculated P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP, P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--DAS, and P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--LAA--ClpXP--CI into DH10, Keio Wild, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells in triplicates. In addition, we induced them into 0uM and 100uM IPTG levels. We also had four controls: a tube of plain LB, DH10 cells, Keio Wild cells, and Keio ClpP Knockout cells. Although the cells grew, none of the tubes showed fluorescence. As a result, we did another set of liquid cultures of P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--no degradation tag/DAS/LAA--ClpXPCI in Keio Wild cells induced with 0uM, 10uM, and 100uM of IPTG into CArbenicillin LB. We also inoculated P-lambda-R--LacI--GFP--ClpXPCI in Keio Wild cells induced with 0uM, 10uM, and 100uM of IPTG into Tetracycline LB. Results TBD (Ms. Standeven is taking these down to the plate reader tonight).





Week 11 Miniprep R0011--ClpXP--CI and Week 11 Miniprep P-Lambda-R-LacI--GFP--ClpXP-CI