Difference between revisions of "Team:LambertGA/Parts"

Line 363: Line 363:
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-10">
 
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-10">
 +
 +
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 400: Line 402:
 
</section>
 
</section>
  
 +
<div class="column full_size" style="width:70%; margin:auto;" >
 +
<div>
 
Our 2016 iGEM team used existing Biobrick parts from the Uppsala team (BBa_K1033906) and also the Endy Lab (BBa_M0050-LAA, M0052-DAS). We were trying to further Edinburgh’s work by expanding upon their experiments with GFP and the degradation tags. We sought to do this by replacing GFP with the ts-Purple chromoprotein and characterizing the ClpXP system. We attempted to characterize these previous parts but ran into some obstacles while working with them.
 
Our 2016 iGEM team used existing Biobrick parts from the Uppsala team (BBa_K1033906) and also the Endy Lab (BBa_M0050-LAA, M0052-DAS). We were trying to further Edinburgh’s work by expanding upon their experiments with GFP and the degradation tags. We sought to do this by replacing GFP with the ts-Purple chromoprotein and characterizing the ClpXP system. We attempted to characterize these previous parts but ran into some obstacles while working with them.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 405: Line 409:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
We sought to improve upon the LAA and DAS degradation tags by showing their relative strength in degrading the ts-Purple chromoprotein and we also sought to improve upon the characterization of the ts-Purple gene so that its relative degradation may be present for anyone who needs it.
 
We sought to improve upon the LAA and DAS degradation tags by showing their relative strength in degrading the ts-Purple chromoprotein and we also sought to improve upon the characterization of the ts-Purple gene so that its relative degradation may be present for anyone who needs it.
 +
<div>
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
  

Revision as of 03:53, 19 October 2016