Difference between revisions of "Team:Stanford-Brown/SB16 Notebooks FQsensor"

Line 103: Line 103:
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
<li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Stanford-Brown/SB16_Software">Software Design</a>
 
<li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Stanford-Brown/SB16_Software">Software Design</a>
 +
</li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2016.igem.org/Team:Stanford-Brown/SB16_Modeling">Modeling</a>
 
</li>
 
</li>
 
<li role="separator" class="divider"></li>
 
<li role="separator" class="divider"></li>

Revision as of 00:39, 19 October 2016


Stanford-Brown 2016

Biosensing (IRES, FQ) · Benchling

Biosensing (IRES, FQ)

Made with Benchling
Project: iGEM 2016
Authors: Michael Becich, Julia Gross, Amy Weissenbach
Dates: 2016-06-24 to 2016-10-03
Friday, 6/24
-Transformed NEB5a cells with BBa_E0040, the GFP plasmid to use as the backbone for the IRES construct (Julia + Amy)
Monday, 6/27
-GFP plates had no colonies. Realized we had the wrong antibiotic, so we re-plated with the correct plates. (Julia + Amy)
Tuesday, 6/28
-Checked GFP plates, they had non fluorescent colonies on them. (Julia + Amy)
-Debugging Heidelberg MAWS Software Issues
-Designing Initial Fluorophore-Quencher Aptamer System
-Intramolecular quenching with PEG linker? Fluorophore on 5' end, Quencher on 3' end
-Tau Day--Considering Biosignatures (ATP)/Toxins (Pb 2+)/Minerals for Biomining to sense
-Pivoting to other systems: Quantum Dots, Augmenting Atomic Force Microscopy, Mechanisms of attachment
Wednesday, 6/29
-Did colony PCR on colonies from the GFP plates, and ran the products on a gel confirming that they had transformed with the correct insert.
-Ordered primers for linearizing the GFP backbone with ends compatible with Gibson assembly of the IRES construct.
-Started liquid cultures of GFP colonies, and of the Heidelberg BioBricks that came in today: BBa_K1614019, BBa_K1614002, and BBa_K1614016. (Julia + Amy)
-Plan to talk with Christina Smolke for ideas about aptamer applications and members of Stanley Qi's Lab for mechanisms of attachment (dCas9, Gal4/UAS)
Thursday, 6/30
-Cryostocked the Heidelberg BioBricks, as well as the GFP colonies.
-Minipreped both the Heidelberg BioBricks and the GFP plasmids.
-PCR amplified the GFP plasmids with the primers that have IRES overhangs, in preparation for doing a Gibson assembly of the IRES fragment into the GFP backbone. (Julia + Amy)
Friday, 7/1
-Planned FQ Constructs too expensive--> Need to pivot to cheaper, 2-piece system
-Use freeze-drying as a positive control for testing attachment of biosensors
-Discussed idea of BioFoundry
Tuesday, 7/5
-Flexible linkers (GGSGGS) superior to rigid ones
-Engineered cheaper solution to FQ design using 2 oligonucleotides rather than 1 (drawback--sensor must be in solution initially for mass action)
Various_FQ_Designs.jpg
thumbnail
Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202305001039
Wednesday, 7/6
-Linearized GFP plasmid with forward and reverse IRES overlap primers through PCR. (JLG/AW)
-FQ Design tradeoff=sterically decreasing non-specific interactions vs. flexibility/separation
-Don't use high GC content
-A/T are susceptible to UV radiation
-No Guanine Quadruplexes
Thursday, 7/7
-Previous GFP plasmid linearizing PCR failed, tried again with a higher annealing temp and using Q5 instead of One-Taq (TP/AW)
-Dilution Assay with 5' Biotin Fluorescein to guage brightness of fluorophores-->how will our sensing platform be sensed once glowing?
-Detectable at mM with naked eye, uM-nM with fluorometers
IMG_2632.JPG
thumbnail
-Idea: denature aptamer once bound to recover target in as high of a concentration possible, measure with Nanodrop
Friday, 7/8
IRES
Higher annealing PCR of 7/7 was successful: 394ng/ul of fairly pure DNA. Ran the product out on a gel, and observed a large band at 3kb, with two smaller bands further forward (probably primer-dimer/non specific amplification). Cut the 3kb band out, and ran it through the Epoch gel extraction kit according to manufacturer instructions. The extraction kit did not work (yield was 6ng/ul of highly impure DNA). Set up new linearizing PCR with the same DNA, primers, Q5, and thermocycler settings as 7/7. (JLG/AW)
FQ Sensors
Tested various concentrations of ATP (100mM - .001nM) on the spectrophotometer. Determined that at concentrations that low, comparing absorption spectra was not a viable way to distinguish between different concentrations. Decided as a result to order the fluorescently labeled ATP DNA aptamer construct, rather than ordering ATP aptamer alone and attempting to gauge efficacy via comparing before and after incubation ATP concentrations.
Put in the order for biotin-ATP aptamer-flourophore oligo, and hybridizing sequence-quencher oligo, both of which should arrive on 7/12. (MB)
ATP_Fluorophore_Biotinylated A new nucleotide sequence entered manually
ATP_Quencher A new nucleotide sequence entered manually
-Consider radio-labeled ATP to differentiate (cheaper assays include dNTP's vs. NTP's)
-Preliminary Plate Layout for 1:1 Fluorophore-Quencher Ratio (1:1 biotinylated fluorophore to Streptavidin-coated plate)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
1
-Control (No Sensor)10mM ATP1mM ATP100uM ATP10uM ATP1uM ATP100M ATP10nM ATP1nM ATPNo ATP
2
10uM Sensor->10mM ATP1mM ATP100uM ATP10uM ATP1uM ATP100M ATP10nM ATP1nM ATPNo ATP
3
1uM Sensor->10mM ATP1mM ATP100uM ATP10uM ATP1uM ATP100M ATP10nM ATP1nM ATPNo ATP
4
10uM Sensor->10mM GTP1mM GTP100uM GTP10uM GTP1uM GTP100M GTP10nM GTP1nM GTPNo GTP
5
1uM Sensor->10mM GTP1mM GTP100uM GTP10uM GTP1uM GTP100M GTP10nM GTP1nM GTPNo GTP
Table1
Monday, 7/11
-IRES linearizing PCR of 7/8 was successful. Preformed PCR extraction on the results, . Preformed Gibson assembly with the backbone, and the linearized construct. Transformed the Gibson plasmids into NE5a chemical competent E. coli cells, plated at 1:10 and 1:100 dilution factors on Amp plates. (AW/JLG)
Tuesday, 7/12
1..5uL of Plasmids obtained from Dave Dingal/Tony Gao of Stanley Qi Lab for possible attachment mechanisms:
pSLQ3604 --> pcDNA3-hNECD1-Gal4
pSLQ3829--> pEV-UAS-hNECD-dCas9-VPR
Wednesday, 7/13
When oligo's arrive, suspend both to 100 uM Stock
Prepare Wash Buffer: Tris-Buffered Saline (25mM Tris, 150 mM NaCL) and 0.1% BSA, 0.05% Tween -20
Adjusted concentration of biotinylated FQ to 10 ug/mL in wash buffer
Excitation/Emission 495/520 for FAM-6
Thursday, 7/14
Prepare 5x SSCT, 2x SSCT, and PBST Buffers according to https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/MAN0011250_Pierce_StreptavidinCoat_96Well_UG.pdf, https://www.thermofisher.co.nz/Uploads/file/Scientific/Applications/Lab-Plasticware-Glassware-Supplies/Thermo-Scientific-Nunc-Immobilizer-Streptavidin-Application-example-PCR-ELISA.PDF (ELISA Protocol Nunc immbolizer)
Wash wells 3-times with 5x SSCT Buffer
Friday, 7/15
Dilute fluorophore and quencher to 100uM in EB
Dilute to 2 uM Stocks in 5x SSCT
Add 100uL to each well: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Sigma/Bulletin/s6940bul.pdf
Incubate for 1 hour (room temp/shaking/dark) to let binding of biotin/streptavidin to occur and let F/Q hybridize
Add ATP gradually and measure fluorescence over time period
Monday, 7/18
Strong signal observed in solution. Focus on proof of concept for first iteration
Weak signal for wells that are not attached-->troubleshoot?
Test different buffers? F/Q combinations? Incubation times?
Signal spike seems to be instantaneous, so how to better measure live?
Tuesday, 7/19
Results from first FQ fluorescence measurements inconclusive.
Back to drawing board. Rather than simulating ELISA conditions, research better conditions for FQ System: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.200501214/full, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202305001039
Wednesday, 7/20
Refined experiment included a hybridization buffer (Tris, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4) to first let F and Q bind.
Crucial improvement was 1x Rxn Buffer for ATP sensing (300mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2, 25mM HEPES)
Concession--must accept 30 second delay between introduction of ATP and Plate Reader (limited by equipment imaging capabilities)
Thursday, 7/21
FQ Sensor
ATP vs. GTP focused study (triplicate of wells)
Performed stepwise concentration plate reader assay to confirm fluorophore-quencher system
Incubated 20nM fluorophore and 20nM quencher in hybridization buffer for 1 hour at room temp. with gentle agitation
Took 11 readings across 5 minute intervals, gradually increasing ATP/NTP concentration according to (limited by stocks of NTP's):
A
B
C
1
Time (min.)μL 100mM ATP AddedμL 100mM NTP Added
2
0-51.51.5 GTP
3
6-101.51.5 UTP
4
11-151.51.5 CTP
5
16-20101.5 GTP
6
21-25101.5 UTP
7
26-30101.5 CTP
8
31-351515 UTP
9
36-401515 CTP
Table2
Troubleshooting: Photobleaching, Further Buffer Optimization, Attached Sensor Still not as successful-->how to capture inital jump?
Friday, 7/22
FQ Sensor
Analyzed Fluorescent Plate Reader Data for Sensing Capabilities (observed 9-fold change in fluorescence at 30mM and linear trend with ATP target concentration)--Confirms Literature
FQ_Stepwise_Graph_FoldChange.JPG
thumbnail
Reperformed assay with dATP, dGTP, ATP, GTP
Attempt to video tape fluoresence peak as added
Sunday, 7/24
Video unsuccessful
Contacted author Yingfu Li on responsiveness of aptamer signaling in nanoengine paper to get insights on other imaging techniques
Tuesday, 7/26
Design a more useful FQ Assay-->Utilize plate reader at Stanford that can measure at certain heights in well
Friday, 7/29
Use two identical plates (one Streptavidin-coated)
Achieve following concentrations in each well: 1 uL F, 1 uL Q in 2x SSCT buffer
Incubate gently while configuring plate reader to optimal fluorescence settings (Gain=65, Height=6.50mm), readjusted before each round of measurment
Took baseline at 12:50pm and every 5 minutes recorded fluorescence. NTP was added to each well to appropriately achieved 10-fold serial dilutions from 1 mM to 1 nM (target total volume=150uL)
IMG_3245.JPG
thumbnail
Inconclusive results were achieved for both the attached and unattached variations.
Next steps: troubleshoot binding with ITC, fix buffers (1x rxn buffer has lower signal, but better performance)
Saturday, 7/30
Considerations for Biosensing: FQ Improvement, IRES Characerizaion, SELEX for Perchlorate/p-ABA Aptamer pool enrichment, PQQ DNAzyme
Building a biodevice for better characterization of FQ Activity:
IMG_4543[1].JPG
thumbnail
Thursday, 8/4
FQ Final Validation:
1.
92 uL Rxn Buffer + 4 uL F/ 4 uLQ (1:1 F:Q)
2.
92 uL Hybridization Buffer + 4 uL F/ 4 uLQ (1:1 F:Q)
3.
94 uL Rxn Buffer + 2 uL F/ 4 uLQ (1:2 F:Q)
4.
94 uL Hybridization Buffer + 2 uL F/ 4 uLQ (1:2 F:Q)
Incubate for 2 hours.
Pipette into plates and dilute with 100uL 2x Rxn Buffer
Incubate in plate gentl shaking for 30 minutes before preparing to image
Settings (Height=6.25mm, Gain=70)
Stepwise increase of ATP/GTP/dATP/dGTP concentrations
1.5 uL of 1 mM, 15uL of 1 mM, 1.5 u of 100mM, 15uL of 100mM, 15uL of 100mM, 15uL of 100mM, 15uL of 100mM (*ran out in some trials)
Final Data:
FQ_FINAL_GRAPHS_UNATTACHED_ATTACHED_10-13-2016.xlsx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
A
B
C
D
E
ControlATP 1F:1QATP 1F:2Q
F
dATP 1F:1QdATP 1F:2Q
G
GTP 1F:1QGTP 1F:2Q
H
dGTP 1F:1QdGTP 1F:2Q
Plate Layout
A
B
C
D
E
1
dATP Added[dATP]AVG_RFU (Gain 70) Normalized to first trialF/F0SD (n=2)
2
0016710
3
0.00000150.009900991681.0059880240.243938
4
0.00001650.09909911731.0359281440.654097
5
0.00016650.991071432071.2395209580.169981
6
0.00166659.106557383832.2934131740.410408
7
0.003166515.99242428204.9101796410.966051
8
9
10
ATP Added[ATP]
11
003310
12
0.00000150.009900993310.388719
13
0.00001650.0990991381.1515151520.965383
14
0.00016650.991071432306.969696971.894411
15
0.00166659.1065573855116.69696971.547684
16
0.003166515.992424280824.484848482.436957
17
18
19
dGTP Added[dGTP]
20
0013410
21
50.0099009913410.064052
22
0.00001650.09909911320.9850746270.108625
23
0.00016650.991071431300.9701492540.032115
24
0.00166659.106557381391.0373134330.114406
25
0.003166515.99242421210.9029850750.120107
26
27
28
GTP Added[GTP]
29
0013510
30
50.0099009913410.097803
31
0.00001650.09909911320.9850746270.045836
32
0.00016650.991071431380.9701492540.011335
33
0.00166659.106557381431.0373134330.033559
34
0.003166515.99242421630.9029850750.095841
35
Unattached FQ Results
A
B
C
D
E
1
dATP Added (mmoles)[dATP]AVG_RFU (Gain 70) Normalized to first trialF/F0SD (n=2)
2
004510
3
0.00000150.00990099430.9555555560.243937944
4
0.00001650.099099099430.9555555560.654097158
5
0.00016650.991071429661.4666666670.169981119
6
0.00166659.1065573772555.6666666670.410407614
7
0.003166515.9924242446010.222222220.96605097
8
0.004666521.908450757912.866666671.109325242
9
0.006166527.0460526360213.377777780.670327385
10
ATP Added[ATP]
11
003310
12
0.00000150.009900993310.388719421
13
0.00001650.099099099381.1515151520.96538261
14
0.00016650.9910714292306.969696971.894411086
15
0.00166659.10655737755116.69696971.5476843
16
0.003166515.9924242480824.484848482.436957161
17
0.004666521.908450792327.969696971.990514531
18
0.006166527.04605263109433.151515153.210473445
19
dGTP Added[dGTP]
20
002810
21
0.00000150.00990099351.250.064051714
22
0.00001650.099099099351.250.108624815
23
0.00016650.991071429321.1428571430.032114939
24
0.00166659.106557377331.1785714290.114405538
25
0.003166515.99242424441.5714285710.120106536
26
0.004666521.9084507431.5357142860.053652181
27
0.006166527.04605263471.6785714290.06508307
28
GTP Added[GTP]
29
0000
30
0.00000150.00990099311.1071428570.097802637
31
0.00001650.099099099331.1785714290.045835897
32
0.00016650.991071429351.250.011335169
33
0.00166659.106557377371.3214285710.033558944
34
0.003166515.99242424441.5714285710.095841188
35
0.004666521.9084507501.7857142860.157668473
36
0.006166527.04605263612.1785714290.126588149
37
Attached Sensor
Unattached_Sensor_Final_Image_Legend.PNG
thumbnail
Attached_Sensor_Final_Image_Legend.PNG
thumbnail
Thursday, 9/22
Took extracted CBD-Streptavidin Part (purified earlier in August/September by Julia) and incubated (shaking, room temp, 2 hours) in 2x B&W Buffer with equimolar amounts of biotinylated fluorophore-quencher
1190ng/uL starting concentration, 100uM Biotinylated Fluorophore and Quencher (Recipe: 100 uL Protein, 31.7 uL Fluorophore)
Pipetted 25 uL onto 9 wax-based wells on cellulose filter paper. Let sit over night (CBD takes 2-3 days to set in)
Friday, 9/23
Re-imaged Plate on reader and Typhoon scanner (Abmax 495 nm Emmax 520 nm) with Trevor's help
Took picture with iPhone under gel scanner
Pre-Wash
thumbnail
Monday, 9/26
(Stanford School resumes)
Imaged in morning
Washed each square with 5x 1mL MilliQ Water (w/ 1mM ATP)
Imaged again on Typhoon Scanner and took picture:
Day 0
thumbnail
Tuesday, 9/27
Washed again 5x 1mL MilliQ Water (w/ 1mM ATP) and re-imaged
1 Day
thumbnail
Friday, 9/30
Low signal traces were still apparent on day after 4 washes
4 Days
thumbnail
Monday, 10/3
After repeating wash each morning for a week, the signal had all but disappeard from even the experimental square:
1 Week
thumbnail