Difference between revisions of "Team:MIT/Safety"

(Prototype team page)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
<p>Please visit <a href="https://2016.igem.org/Safety">the main Safety page</a> to find this year's safety requirements & deadlines, and to learn about safe & responsible research in iGEM.</p>
+
<h1 style="color:#FFFFFF; background-color:#7ecefd;; -moz-border-radius: 15px; -webkit-border-radius: 15px; padding:15px; text-align: center; font-family: Trebuchet MS">Safety</h1>  
  
<p>On this page of your wiki, you should write about how you are addressing any safety issues in your project. The wiki is a place where you can <strong>go beyond the questions on the safety forms</strong>, and write about whatever safety topics are most interesting in your project. (You do not need to copy your safety forms onto this wiki page.)</p>
+
<h2> Laboratory Safety </h2>
  
</div>
+
<p>
  
 +
Before our team began working on our project, we received laboratory safety training in General Biosafety for Researchers, Managing Hazardous Waste, General Chemical Hygiene, and Blood-Borne Pathogens training. These training sessions were given by MIT’s Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) office and prepared us to work with both BL1 materials, such as the E. coli we used for molecular cloning, and BL2 materials, including the human cell lines HEK293, MCF-7, and tHESC, which we used for our experiments.
  
<div class="column full_size">
+
To ensure the safety of ourselves and the biological materials we worked with, we used appropriate personal protective equipment, including gloves, lab coats, and eyewear when necessary. When working with mammalian cells, we worked in biosafety cabinets in a separate room in the lab and wore different lab coats specifically to be used for tissue culture to maximize sterility. When we introduced nucleic acids into mammalian cells, we used either cationic lipid-based transient transfection or electroporation instead of viral infection, since viruses present a greater safety threat. We disposed all chemical reagents, including Qiagen miniprep/midiprep buffers, in clearly labeled containers around the laboratory in accordance with the protocols laid out by their MSDS.
<h5>Safe Project Design</h5>
+
  
<p>Does your project include any safety features? Have you made certain decisions about the design to reduce risks? Write about them here! For example:</p>
+
</p>
  
<ul>
+
<h2> Biological Parts Safety </h2>
<li>Choosing a non-pathogenic chassis</li>
+
<li>Choosing parts that will not harm humans / animals / plants</li>
+
<li>Substituting safer materials for dangerous materials in a proof-of-concept experiment</li>
+
<li>Including an "induced lethality" or "kill-switch" device</li>
+
</ul>
+
  
</div>
+
<p>
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
In our experiments for testing our miRNA sensors, we cotransfected siRNAs into mammalian cells with the sensors. While these siRNAs could be hazardous if they were introduced to human cells, our personal protective equipment was sufficient to protect ourselves from this possibility. Additionally, we never worked with recombinant plasmids encoding miRNAs, and our transfection system was neither infectious nor self-replicating, which lowered the safety risks for working with these materials even lower.
<h5>Safe Lab Work</h5>
+
  
<p>What safety procedures do you use every day in the lab? Did you perform any unusual experiments, or face any unusual safety issues? Write about them here!</p>
 
  
</div>
+
</p>
  
<div class="column half_size">
+
<h2> Project Design Safety </h2>
<h5>Safe Shipment</h5>
+
  
<p>Did you face any safety problems in sending your DNA parts to the Registry? How did you solve those problems?</p>
+
<p>
</div>
+
  
 +
In order to greatly improve the safety of our project, we decided to design a diagnostic that works in vitro rather than in vivo, which removes any concern of the project causing any health-related side effects to a patient. Additionally, since our project is a diagnostic, we decided to make the output for a positive diagnosis the production of a yellow fluorescent protein, which is nontoxic to human cells. The only protein we worked with that is toxic to cells at high concentrations is the RNA binding protein L7Ae, which we are using to lower the basal expression of the recombinase TP901. We address this toxicity by expressing the protein under the doxycycline-inducible promoter pTRE, which allows us to externally control the amount of L7Ae being expressed in the cells by growing the cells in an appropriate concentration of doxycycline. The recombinase itself is potentially hazardous, since it performs unidirectional inversion of DNA, but since the plasmid encoding it will be introduced to cells in a biopsy sample rather than a living human, there is no risk of harming any patients with our diagnostic.
 +
 +
</p>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 09:54, 15 October 2016

Safety

Laboratory Safety

Before our team began working on our project, we received laboratory safety training in General Biosafety for Researchers, Managing Hazardous Waste, General Chemical Hygiene, and Blood-Borne Pathogens training. These training sessions were given by MIT’s Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) office and prepared us to work with both BL1 materials, such as the E. coli we used for molecular cloning, and BL2 materials, including the human cell lines HEK293, MCF-7, and tHESC, which we used for our experiments. To ensure the safety of ourselves and the biological materials we worked with, we used appropriate personal protective equipment, including gloves, lab coats, and eyewear when necessary. When working with mammalian cells, we worked in biosafety cabinets in a separate room in the lab and wore different lab coats specifically to be used for tissue culture to maximize sterility. When we introduced nucleic acids into mammalian cells, we used either cationic lipid-based transient transfection or electroporation instead of viral infection, since viruses present a greater safety threat. We disposed all chemical reagents, including Qiagen miniprep/midiprep buffers, in clearly labeled containers around the laboratory in accordance with the protocols laid out by their MSDS.

Biological Parts Safety

In our experiments for testing our miRNA sensors, we cotransfected siRNAs into mammalian cells with the sensors. While these siRNAs could be hazardous if they were introduced to human cells, our personal protective equipment was sufficient to protect ourselves from this possibility. Additionally, we never worked with recombinant plasmids encoding miRNAs, and our transfection system was neither infectious nor self-replicating, which lowered the safety risks for working with these materials even lower.

Project Design Safety

In order to greatly improve the safety of our project, we decided to design a diagnostic that works in vitro rather than in vivo, which removes any concern of the project causing any health-related side effects to a patient. Additionally, since our project is a diagnostic, we decided to make the output for a positive diagnosis the production of a yellow fluorescent protein, which is nontoxic to human cells. The only protein we worked with that is toxic to cells at high concentrations is the RNA binding protein L7Ae, which we are using to lower the basal expression of the recombinase TP901. We address this toxicity by expressing the protein under the doxycycline-inducible promoter pTRE, which allows us to externally control the amount of L7Ae being expressed in the cells by growing the cells in an appropriate concentration of doxycycline. The recombinase itself is potentially hazardous, since it performs unidirectional inversion of DNA, but since the plasmid encoding it will be introduced to cells in a biopsy sample rather than a living human, there is no risk of harming any patients with our diagnostic.