Difference between revisions of "Team:LMU-TUM Munich/Results"

(Mass spectroscopy)
(Fluorescence spectroscopy)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
===Fluorescence spectroscopy===
 
===Fluorescence spectroscopy===
 +
[[File:Muc16_results_flt.png|thumb|right|250px| <i><b>Figure 3:</b></i> Fluorescence titration curves for various avidin variants.]]
 +
 
===Surface plasmon resonance===
 
===Surface plasmon resonance===
 
Unfortunately every single Avidin variant bound on the surface of the used chip. Therefore no evaluable results were gathered.   
 
Unfortunately every single Avidin variant bound on the surface of the used chip. Therefore no evaluable results were gathered.   

Revision as of 12:21, 19 October 2016



Characterization of various Avidin variants

Streptavidin and its variants were produced by cytoplasmic expression in E. coli in inclusion bodies. After stabilization and refolding of the functional tetrameric and monomeric variants, purification was carried out by ammonium sulfate precipitation, Ion Exchange Chromatography and size exclusion chromatography. Samples of each required step were analysed by SDS-PAGE. Finally each of the successfully purified variants were characterized. Mass spectrometry was used to confirm the expected size, circular dichroism spectroscopy (cd) to determine folding states, fluorescence titration and surface plasmon resonance for determining binding affinities.

Results can be seen in Table 1.

Mass spectroscopy

To determine if the mass of each measured protein conforms to our expectations based on the sequence, mass spectra were recorded and can be seen in the following figure 1-3.

Circular dichroism spectroscopy

De- and renaturation curves as well as UV-CD-spectra were measured and can be seen in figure 1 and 2. All cd spectra were evaluated by Spectra Manager Software and results can be seen in figure 3. Also the temperature where 50 % of the protein were unfolded were calculated. Therefore the data for each protein were entered into a GraphPad Prism sheet and calculated respectively. Results can be seen in table 1.

Figure 1: UV-CD-spectra for each measured protein.
Figure 2: Denaturation curves for each measured protein.
Figure 3: Distribution of secondary structure elements for each protein.

Fluorescence spectroscopy

Figure 3: Fluorescence titration curves for various avidin variants.

Surface plasmon resonance

Unfortunately every single Avidin variant bound on the surface of the used chip. Therefore no evaluable results were gathered.

Table 1: Properties of various Avidin variants.
protein amino acids (without Met) molecular weight monomer [Da] molecular weight tetramer [Da] theoretical isoelectric proint (pI) pI (Isoelectric focusing) extinction coefficient (monomer, ε280) [M-1 cm-1] KD
Streptavidin wt 126 13200.34 52801.36 6.09 41940
Traptavidin 126 13129.22 52516.88 5.14 41940
Streptactin 126 13241.44 52516.88 8.32 41940
enhanced monomeric Avidin 138 15220.30 / 5.91 35075

Kopiervorlagen

Seitenverantwortliche/r: Wird am Schluss gemacht.

Literaturreferenz

Literaturreferenz[1]

Bei Google Scholar bitte das APA-Ziteirformat verwenden.

Textformatierung

kursiv
fett
Strich


Links

Wikiinterner Link Team:LMU-TUM_Munich/Materials (As described in the Materials section)


Wikiexterner Link Visit W3Schools
Visit W3Schools

Bilder

Bildunterschrift





















Introduction

Design

Experiments

Proof of concept

Demonstrate

Discussion

References

  1. Schmidt, T. G., & Skerra, A. (2007). The Strep-tag system for one-step purification and high-affinity detection or capturing of proteins. Nature protocols, 2(6), 1528-1535.

up button Back to top

LMU & TUM Munich

Technische Universität MünchenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München

United team from Munich's universities

Contact us:

Address

iGEM Team TU-Munich
Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5
85354 Freising, Germany